GST

TCS on motor vehicle not part of value of goods and services – HC admits Petition

TCS on motor vehicle u/s 206C(1F) of the Income Tax Act not integral part of the value of the goods and services supplied – High Court admits Petition

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2734 (2019) (01) HC

Section 15 of the Goods and Services Tax Act speaks of the value of goods and services, besides defining how the value of supply shall be reckoned.

It says that the value of supply of goods, services, or both shall be the· transaction  value,  which  is  the  price  actually  paid  or payable for the said supply of goods or services or both where the supplier and the recipient of the supply.

Section 15(2) mandates that the value of supply shall  include  any taxes, duties,  cesses,  fees  and  charges levied under any other law in force.

The case of the Petitioner was that the amount of  1% the dealer collects from the purchaser of a car worth more than ten lakhs, under Section 206C(1F) of the Income Tax Act, cannot be treated as an integral part of the value of the goods and services supplied by the petitioner.

It was submitted that the Petitioner, as the dealer of the motor vehicle, acts only  as  an  agent  for  the  State  to  collect  the income tax under Section 206C(1F). And that amount will eventually goes to the vehicle purchaser’s credit.

The Petitioner relied upon the last portion of Section 15(2)(a), which emphasises “charging of tax,  duties, cess or fee by the_supplier“.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that recently a constitution Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that any ambiguity in taxing provision should be resolved in the State’s fare.  

However, the Court admitted the Petition stating that the petitioner had raised a prima facie issue, which needed Court’s attention for further and deeper adjudication.

The High Court directed that the authority will not act on the issue till the disposal of the writ petition.

 Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE once assessee waived option

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is a findings of fact – High Court

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Interest earned on borrowed funds/unutilized capital subsidy is capital receipts – High Court

Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Guwahati High Court has…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act – HC

There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand  …

2 days ago