GST

UP GST Mobile squad officers to be punished for non compliance of High Court orders

GST Mobile squad officers to be punished for non compliance of High Court orders-UP GST Commissioner

Commissioner of Commercial Tax (GST), Uttar Pradesh has issued a letter to all officers stating that it has come to the knowledge of the Head Office that officers working at mobile squad are not ensuring timely compliance of the orders of the Hon’ble High Court passed in pursuance of writ petitions filed the vehicle owners/vehicle driver/transporter/traders against the action taken during the enforcement work.

As per the letter, as a result, the petitioners again have to file petition to ensure the compliance of the order passed by the Hon’ble High Court which is not a desirable state.

The letter directs for ensuring timely compliance of the orders of the Hon’ble High Court. It also states that if with respect to the order of Hon’ble High Court, there is a need to lodge the departmental view or if appeal/revision petition is required, immediate action should be ensured.

The letter warns that in future, in the event of non compliance of the orders of Hon’ble High Court within the time, harsh action shall be taken against the concerned officer treating it as indiscipline and the responsibility of the supervisory officer shall also be fixed.

Download Copy of Letter Click Here >>

Also Read:

Illegal seizure of goods by mobile squad-GST Official summoned by Allahabad High Court

UP Govt has no power to require TDF for inter state goods movement, seizure for want of TDF declared illegal

High Court directs reopening of GST Portal for filing TRAN-1 of Petitioner as it did not respond on the last date

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

4 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

6 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

7 days ago