ICAI has issued the following guidelines whereby any chartered accountant member responding to an exclusive areas of practice (like audit and attestation) shall be liable for disciplinary action.
Council Affairs |
4th April, 2016 |
ANNOUNCEMENT – RESPONDING TO TENDERS |
The matter pertaining to responding to tenders issued by various users of professional services or organization in areas exclusively reserved for the members of the Institute was recently considered by the Council of the Institute. The Council on a consideration of the matter has decided that – a) In the exclusive areas of practice of Chartered Accountants, like audit and attestation services i.e. those areas where the assignments can be performed only by Chartered Accountants or where only Chartered Accountants have been invited for audit assignments, members should not respond to such tenders. In such cases, entities may avail the multipurpose empanelment data available with ICAI. However, wherever minimum fee of the assignment is prescribed in the tender document itself, members may participate in such tendering process. b) In those areas, where along with Chartered Accountants, other professionals can also apply for the tender, there is no restriction for the Chartered Accountants to respond to the tenders floated by authorities from time to time. The Council has further decided that its aforesaid decision be suitably issued as a guidelines of the Council under clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and any member who contravenes any of the provisions of the above guidelines shall be liable for disciplinary action under Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. While the guidelines of the Council on the above matter is being issued separately under clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, this Announcement is being issued for advance information of the members at large. |
(V. Sagar) Secretary |
Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…
Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…
Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Guwahati High Court has…
There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand …
Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…