ICAI has issued the following guidelines whereby any chartered accountant member responding to an exclusive areas of practice (like audit and attestation) shall be liable for disciplinary action.
| Council Affairs |
| 4th April, 2016 |
| ANNOUNCEMENT – RESPONDING TO TENDERS |
|
The matter pertaining to responding to tenders issued by various users of professional services or organization in areas exclusively reserved for the members of the Institute was recently considered by the Council of the Institute. The Council on a consideration of the matter has decided that – a) In the exclusive areas of practice of Chartered Accountants, like audit and attestation services i.e. those areas where the assignments can be performed only by Chartered Accountants or where only Chartered Accountants have been invited for audit assignments, members should not respond to such tenders. In such cases, entities may avail the multipurpose empanelment data available with ICAI. However, wherever minimum fee of the assignment is prescribed in the tender document itself, members may participate in such tendering process. b) In those areas, where along with Chartered Accountants, other professionals can also apply for the tender, there is no restriction for the Chartered Accountants to respond to the tenders floated by authorities from time to time. The Council has further decided that its aforesaid decision be suitably issued as a guidelines of the Council under clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and any member who contravenes any of the provisions of the above guidelines shall be liable for disciplinary action under Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. While the guidelines of the Council on the above matter is being issued separately under clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, this Announcement is being issued for advance information of the members at large. |
| (V. Sagar) Secretary |
FAQs for HSNS Cess Act, 2025 and HSNS Cess Rules, 2026 Q1. Who is required to get registered under the…
Refusing to condone delay can result in a meritorious matter thrown out at very threshold against case being decided on…
When prior period expenses are not admissible as deduction, following the same principle the prior period income also cannot be…
Supreme Court condoned delay of 972 days in filing appeal due to restructuring in Income Tax Department In a recent…
Addition can not be made relying on the valuation report of property when the stamp duty valuation is also available…
Wrong claim of deduction u/s 54F/54B was not a case of concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars…