ICAI

ICAI bans CA guilty of professional misconduct, removes name from Register of Members for a year

ICAI bans CA guilty of professional misconduct, removes name from the Register of Members for one year for non exercising due diligence/grossly negligent

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
(Set up by an Act of Parliament)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 15th June, 2018

(CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS)

No. PR-52/10-DD-72/10/DC/315/2014.—In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 [as amended by the Chartered Accountants (Amendment) Act, 2006] read with Rules 18(17) and 19(1) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, CA. Ishaq Esmail Lakkadghat (Membership No. 120260), 602, Cadel Castle, 30, V S Marg, Cadel Road, Mahim (West), Mumbai-400 016, has been held guilty of professional misconduct falling within the meaning of Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the aforesaid Act by the Disciplinary Committee and consequently ordered for removal of the name of aforesaid CA. Ishaq Esmail Lakkadghat(Membership No. 120260) from the Register of Members for a period of one (01) year. In pursuance thereof and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 20 of the aforesaid Act, read with Regulation 18 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988, it is hereby notified that the name of said CA. Ishaq Esmail Lakkadghat (Membership No. 120260), shall stand removed from the Register of Members for a period of one (01) year with effect from 15th June, 2018.

V. SAGAR, Secy.
[ADVT.-III/4/Exty./105/18]

Note from Author:
Part-I of the Second Schedule deals with Professional misconduct in relation to chartered accountants in practice. As per clause (7), a chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he does not exercise due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties.

Share

Recent Posts

  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

3 days ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

5 days ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

7 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

7 days ago