ICAI

ICAI bans CA guilty of professional misconduct, removes name from Register of Members for a year

ICAI bans CA guilty of professional misconduct, removes name from the Register of Members for one year for non exercising due diligence/grossly negligent

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
(Set up by an Act of Parliament)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 15th June, 2018

(CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS)

No. PR-52/10-DD-72/10/DC/315/2014.—In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 [as amended by the Chartered Accountants (Amendment) Act, 2006] read with Rules 18(17) and 19(1) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, CA. Ishaq Esmail Lakkadghat (Membership No. 120260), 602, Cadel Castle, 30, V S Marg, Cadel Road, Mahim (West), Mumbai-400 016, has been held guilty of professional misconduct falling within the meaning of Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the aforesaid Act by the Disciplinary Committee and consequently ordered for removal of the name of aforesaid CA. Ishaq Esmail Lakkadghat(Membership No. 120260) from the Register of Members for a period of one (01) year. In pursuance thereof and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 20 of the aforesaid Act, read with Regulation 18 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988, it is hereby notified that the name of said CA. Ishaq Esmail Lakkadghat (Membership No. 120260), shall stand removed from the Register of Members for a period of one (01) year with effect from 15th June, 2018.

V. SAGAR, Secy.
[ADVT.-III/4/Exty./105/18]

Note from Author:
Part-I of the Second Schedule deals with Professional misconduct in relation to chartered accountants in practice. As per clause (7), a chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he does not exercise due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme

ITAT allows exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit the amount in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme and new asset…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition to be made in hands of assessee solely on basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet

Addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee solely on the basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet - ITAT In…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) dismissed beyond Rs. 3 lakhs

ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

2 days ago