ICAI

ICAI bans CA guilty of professional misconduct, removes name from Register of Members for a year

ICAI bans CA guilty of professional misconduct, removes name from the Register of Members for one year for non exercising due diligence/grossly negligent

THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA
(Set up by an Act of Parliament)

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 15th June, 2018

(CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS)

No. PR-52/10-DD-72/10/DC/315/2014.—In terms of the provisions of Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 [as amended by the Chartered Accountants (Amendment) Act, 2006] read with Rules 18(17) and 19(1) of the Chartered Accountants (Procedure of Investigations of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of Cases) Rules, 2007, CA. Ishaq Esmail Lakkadghat (Membership No. 120260), 602, Cadel Castle, 30, V S Marg, Cadel Road, Mahim (West), Mumbai-400 016, has been held guilty of professional misconduct falling within the meaning of Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the aforesaid Act by the Disciplinary Committee and consequently ordered for removal of the name of aforesaid CA. Ishaq Esmail Lakkadghat(Membership No. 120260) from the Register of Members for a period of one (01) year. In pursuance thereof and in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 20 of the aforesaid Act, read with Regulation 18 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988, it is hereby notified that the name of said CA. Ishaq Esmail Lakkadghat (Membership No. 120260), shall stand removed from the Register of Members for a period of one (01) year with effect from 15th June, 2018.

V. SAGAR, Secy.
[ADVT.-III/4/Exty./105/18]

Note from Author:
Part-I of the Second Schedule deals with Professional misconduct in relation to chartered accountants in practice. As per clause (7), a chartered accountant in practice shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct, if he does not exercise due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

If assessee fails to explain source of purchases, estimating profit rate contrary to Section 69C

When assessee failed to explain source of purchases expenditure, estimating profit rate was contrary to provision of Section 69C which…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Income Tax Department not trusted even upon its lawyers – SC slams ITD for delay

Income Tax Department not trusted even upon its lawyers – SC slams ITD on adopting a long process resulting delay…

22 hours ago
  • GST

Goods loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill stating both truck numbers – No evasion

When goods are loaded in two trucks with one e-way bill specifically mentioning both truck numbers, no intention to evade…

2 days ago
  • Labour Laws

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025

GOI makes four new Labour Codes  effective from 21st November 2025 Government of India has announced that the four Labour…

2 days ago
  • EPFO

Provident fund dues have first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – SC

Provident fund dues definitely have a first charge over claim of bank under SARFAESI Act – Supreme Court In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025

CBDT notifies the Capital Gains Accounts (Second Amendment) Scheme, 2025 MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT…

3 days ago