ICAI bans eight CAs due to professional misconduct
ICAI has banned/Removed names of six chartered accountants from the Register of Members for their professional misconduct.
These Chartered Accountants were held by Disciplinary Committee of ICAI guilty of Professional Misconduct and were removed from the Register of Members for specified period with fine to be paid within stipulated a period. Since the CAs failed to pay the imposed fine within stipulated time, they have been removed for a further period as under:
| CA name & Membership Np. | City | Removal/Ban Period |
| Samaba Siva Rao M (Membership No. 021858), | BENGALURU | One month w.e.f. 20.01.2022 |
| CA. Jala Durga Srinivas Kambhampati (Membership No. 200487 | VISAKHAPATNAM 5 | consolidated period of 4 months , 03 months plus additional 1 month with effect from 20th January, 2022 |
| CA. Baddakoti Chinnappa Gowda (Membership No. 204458) | BENGALURU | One month with effect from 20th January, 2022 |
| CA. Rajagopalan Vedanarayanan (Membership No. 029472 | CHENNAI | One month with effect from 20th January, 2022 |
| CA. Lalith Kumar A (Membership No. 212155) | CHENNAI | consolidated period of Two months [One month plus additional one month] with effect from 20th January, 2022 |
Also, in following case, punishment awarded by the Disciplinary Committee is confirmed / modified as per order of the Appellate Authority
| CA. Devki Nandan Gupta (Membership No. 052634 | KOLKATA | Period of removal reduced from two years to one year as per order of the Appellate Authority. |
| CA. Krishan Kumar Singhal (Membership No. 050140) | KOLKATA | Removed for two years as confirmed by the Appellate Authority. |
Further in following cases, the removal has been notified as per the findings of the Disciplinary Committee:
| CA. Rajendra Nath Bhar (Membership No. 052197), | KOLKATA | Six months with effect from 20thJanuary, 2022 |
Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…
High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…
Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…
Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…
Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…
CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…