ICAI

ICAI invites suggestions-feedback on evaluation of examination Answer Books System

ICAI invites suggestions/feedback on evaluation of examination Answer Books System

ICAI has formed a Group to review the evaluation of examination answer book system. The group has invited Suggestion/ Feedback of the CA students on the evaluation of examination answer books system through the following link:-
The feedback is in the form of Question-Answer Format consisting of following 9 questions to be answered by the student by selecting the option given. 
1. Should re-evaluation (Since Re-verification is currently allowed, it seems that what is intended is re-evaluation) be allowed from November 2018 examinations onward 
– Yes
– No
2. How should examiners be selected ? 
– On the basis of years of experience in the respective field
– On the basis of years of experience in the respective field and personal interview
3. What should be the structure of question paper? 
– Wholly Objective
4. Which among the following will improve the evaluation system? 
– Dual valuation of every answer book
5. Do you think that centralized Evaluation will help in eliminating such few instances of incorrect evaluation? 
Yes
6. Do you think that increasing the number of examiners and improving the standards of their training and monitoring will alone help in eliminating the instances of incorrect evaluation ? 
Yes
7. Do you think that the low pass percentage of CA Examinations is solely on account of incorrect evaluation of answer sheets? 
Yes
8. Do you think there is any correlation between pass percentage and CA examinations and evaluation system 
Yes
9. Do you think that introducing MCQs will help in reducing the instances of incorrect evaluation? 
– Yes
Share
Leave a Comment

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

6 days ago