PART B-PART C of MEF 2016-17 made live till 31-10-2016 to enable the applicants fill and edit the same. No need to send the declarations again-ICAI
Message from PDC, ICAI
Dear Professional Colleagues,
Season’s Greetings,
Sub: PART B and PART C of MEF 2016-17 has been made live till 31st October, 2016 to enable the applicants to fill/edit the same.
As you are aware, MEF 2016-17 has been divided into three parts:
Part A: For Bank Branch Auditors’ Panel
Part B: For Additional information for Multipurpose Empanelment
Part C: For Panel of Cooperative Societies and Cooperative Banks
To ease out the submission process, we had made PART B and PART C non-functional which was not applicable for Bank Branch Auditors’ Panel. PART B and PART C is live now and would be functional till 31st October, 2016 to enable the applicants to fill/edit the same.
Applicants, who have submitted PART A of MEF can now login Multipurpose Empanelment Form 2016-17 through their credentials (MRN/FRN & Password) created this year to fill/edit PART B and/or PART C of MEF. As you are aware that after the issuance of the Notification dated 7th April, 2016 on responding to tenders, entities are being advised to avail the Multipurpose Empanelment data available with ICAI for allotting various assignments. In addition to this we are also receiving request for panel from Cooperative Societies. So accordingly PART B & PART C has been included in MEF 2016-17.
We therefore request all the applicants to login and fill/edit the form. After finishing, PART B and/or PART C there is no need to send the Declaration again. Those who have already filled PART B & PART C need not fill it again. However, they may edit any information which they have given earlier.
Endeavoring to facilitate you for submitting PART B and PART C of Multipurpose Empanelment Form for the year 2016-17.
Regards,
CA. Prafulla Premsukh Chhajed CA. Ranjeet Kumar Agarwal
Chairman, PDC
Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…
Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…
Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…
Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…
Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Guwahati High Court has…
There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand …