ICAI

Re-appointment of auditor in company who ceases to be covered by section 139 – ICAI

Re-appointment of erstwhile auditor in company who ceases to be governed by the rotation principles u/s 139 can be made – ICAI

ICAI has clarified on the applicability of Auditor’s Rotation principles on a company as per Section 139 of the Companies Act 2013 where the company ceases to fall under the ambit of Rotation principles in subsequent years.

Section 139 (2) of the Companies Act 2013 provides that no listed company or a company belonging to such class or classes of companies as may be prescribed, shall appoint or reappoint—

(a) an individual as auditor for more than one term of five consecutive years; and

(b) an audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of five consecutive years:

Further as per the “Companies (Audit and Auditors) Rules, 2014, for the purposes of subsection (2) of section 139, the class of companies shall mean the following classes of companies excluding one person companies and small companies:-

(a) all unlisted public companies having paid up share capital of rupees ten crore or more;

(b) all private limited companies having paid up share capital of rupees fifty crore or more;

(c) all companies having paid up share capital of below threshold limit mentioned in (a) and (b) above, but having public borrowings from financial institutions, banks or public deposits of rupees fifty crores or more.

The ICAI has illustrated the issue with an example as under:

“A Chartered Accountant/firm, an auditor in a company on which Rules relating to Rotation of auditors were applicable, retired in the year 2017 and a new auditor appointed in the same year. After amendment was brought as per Companies (Amendment) Act 2017, the company do not meet principles of rotation of auditors in the year 2018.

The Query

Whether the auditor who was an auditor of the company in the year 2017 can be reappointed by the company as the company ceases to fall under the criteria of rotation of auditors?”

ICAI View

It has been stated that the Corporate Laws & Corporate Governance Committee of the ICAI at its 43rd meeting held on 7th January, 2019 discussed the issue and was of the view that since the requirement of rotation of auditors is not applicable on the company subsequently, therefore the auditor who was the auditor in the company earlier in the year 2017 can be reappointed without prejudice to the other provisions of the Companies Act 2013.

In other words, once a company ceases to fall under the ambit of Rotation principles, the company can appoint any chartered accountant/ firm as an auditor of the company irrespective of the fact that the same chartered accountant/ firm was an auditor of the company in previous years.

Note: Subsequent to MCA instructions, ICAI has withdrawn the above advisory

ANNOUNCEMENT

Withdrawal of the Announcement regarding Clarification on Applicability of Rotation principles on a company as per Section 139 of the Companies Act 2013 where the company ceases to fall under the ambit of Rotation principles in subsequent years.

The Corporate Laws & Corporate Governance Committee had issued the announcement regarding clarification on the applicability of Rotation principles on a company as per Section 139 of the Companies Act 2013 where the company ceases to fall under the ambit of Rotation principles in subsequent years on 29th January, 2019

The aforesaid Announcement is withdrawn and it shall not be taken in to effect.

(Rakesh Sehgal)
Acting Secretary

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Penalty for late supply of goods allowable deduction u/s 37 being not a crime or prohibited activity

Penalty levied for late supply of goods is an allowable deduction u/s 37 as late supply neither a crime nor…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest received from Cooperative banks allowable deduction u/s 80P to a Cooperative Society

Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) towards interest received from cooperative banks is allowable to a cooperative society. In a recent judgment, Hon'ble…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

SC to decide distinction in employees & employer contribution to PF, ESI for allowability u/s 43B

Supreme Court to decide difference between employees & employer contribution to PF, ESI for allowability under Section 43B of the…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No liability to collect TCS u/s 206C (1C) from person involved in illegal mining – SC

There is no legislative mandate to collect tax at source under section 206C (1C) from the person involved in illegal…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Receipts mentioning that it was towards corpus, donation assumed to be for corpus of trust

In the absence of objection by donors to receipts mentioning that donations were towards corpus, it is assumed that donations…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Credit in partner’s capital account for book entry adjustments can not be added u/s 68

Credit in assessee’s capital account consequent to book entry adjustments in the books of the partnership firm can not be…

4 days ago