ICSI

ICSI submits representation to MCA to issue clarification on deployment of Form MSME-I

ICSI submits representation to MCA to issue a clarification on deployment of Form MSME-I in view of the deadline of 30 days as per Notification

The Institute Company Secretaries of India (ICSI) has submitted a representation to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) on the subject of deployment of Form MSME-1

MCA had issued Notification No. 5.0. 368(E) dated 22nd January, 2019 notifying the “Specified Companies (Furnishing of information about payment to micro and small enterprise suppliers) Order, 2019” wherein it has been directed that every specified company shall file in MSME Form I details of all outstanding dues to Micro or small enterprises suppliers existing on the date of notification of this order within thirty days from the date of publication of this notification.

Therefore, going by the said notification, every specified company is required to file the Initial return of outstanding dues to Micro or Small Enterprises Suppliers in MSME Form-I by 21st February, 2019.

The ICSI has pointed out that although the MSME Form I for furnishing the above details with the Registrar in respect of outstanding payments to Micro or Small Enterprises has been prescribed in the aforesaid notification, the said e-form has not yet been made available on the MCA website.

It has been stated that with the due date arrived, the said eForm not being available, it is practically not possible for the companies falling within the ambit of this law to comply with this requirement. The difficulties are further accentuated for companies with wide business network to gather information from suppliers pertaining to their MSME Registration status.

In light of the above, the ICSI has requested the MCA to consider clarifying that MSME Form I will be deployed shortly and also that non-filing due to non-availability of this Form by February 21 would not result in non-compliance of the provisions of Companies Act, 2013.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

15 hours ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

16 hours ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

1 day ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

2 days ago