ICSI

ICSI warns members on unscrupulous practices adopted for e-form INC 22A ACTIVE compliance

ICSI cautions members on resorting to unscrupulous practices by undertaking multiple appointments and resignations solely for e-form INC 22A (ACTIVE) compliance

Dear Professional Colleague, 

Subject: Filing of e-Form INC 22A (ACTIVE) – ADVISORY 

As per Rule 25A of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 inserted through the Companies (Incorporation) Amendment Rules, 2019 and further amended through the Companies (Incorporation) Fourth Amendment Rules, 2019, “Every company incorporated on or before 31st December, 2017 shall file particulars of the company and its registered office, in e-Form ACTIVE (Active Company Tagging Identities and Verification) on or before 15.06.2019”. 

The above initiative of the Ministry can very well be considered as a move to strengthen the existing governance structure thereby bringing in greater stability in the corporate scenario. 

However, it has been noticed that the compliance of the same is not being undertaken in true letter and spirit and that some of the corporates and professionals are resorting to unscrupulous practices by undertaking multiple appointments and resignations, solely for the purpose of compliance pertaining to e-form INC 22A (ACTIVE) without understanding and realizing the significance of this compliance. 

For us as professionals, it needs to be understood that the wrongdoing of a few members shall portray the entire profession in a bad light and raise concerns regarding the integrity and ethics of governance professionals. 

In light of the above as well as the long-term impact of such activities, members of the Institute are advised to ensure complete integrity in their conduct and pursue the profession in an ethical manner. 

It may please be noted that disciplinary action against such erring member(s) will be initiated under the Company Secretaries Act, 1980. 

Regards, 

(CS Ashok Kumar Dixit)
Officiating Secretary
The Institute of Company Secretaries of India 

 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago