Income Tax

12 Mistakes/Practices that would invite TDS-TCS Survey by Income Tax Department

12 Mistakes/Practices that would invite TDS/TCS Survey by Income Tax Department. Follow best practices to ensure proper compliance of TDS provisions

The Income Tax Central Action Plan 2018-19 has set a target of at least 30 surveys/spot verifications by each Assessing Officer during the year. CPC (TDS) regularly provides useful reports/ inputs to the income tax officers which may be used for identifying survey cases.

Surveys can be effective tools for detection of non-compliance in TDS/TCS and identifying defaults u/s 40(a)(i)/(ia)/(iii) of the Act.

The following indices have been listed in the CAP 2018-19 for selecting a potential case for survey. As a responsible businessman one should follow the applicable provisions related to TDS/TCS and avoid the following situations.

1. If your case is in prosecution list (where TDS/TCS not deposited after deduction);

2. If your TDS payment trend is in stark contrast to other deductors in similar business;

3. If there is a negative trend in payment under a particular Section as compared to preceding Financial year

4. If a Tax evasion petitions (TEP) has been filed against you for non deduction of TDS);

5. If your Assessing Officer has made a huge disallowance u/s 40(a) (ia)

6. If you are a habitual late filers/non-filers of TDS Statement which is primarily due to late payment or non/short deduction

7. If there is a negative growth in TDS payment as against healthy growth in Advance tax payment;

8. If you make frequent corrections in TDS Statements and also the name of deductors is regularly changed.

9. If you are a sick unit or units with negative operating margins as reported in Tax Audit report u/s 44AB

10. If a grievance petition has been filed by the deductee against you

11. if against you there is some adverse news/information available through media/internet;

12. If analysis of case laws decided against you suggests tds defaults

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

HC frowns at Provisional attachment orders under GST not lifted on expiry of one year

High Court frowns at Provisional attachment orders passed u/s 83(1) GST lifted only their illegality being questioned In a recent…

4 mins ago
  • Income Tax

In Faceless assessment grant of opportunity of personal hearing not optional for AO

In Faceless assessment grant of opportunity of personal hearing is not optional at discretion of the Assessing Officer its waiver…

60 mins ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT Guidelines for compulsory selection of return for complete scrutiny FY 2024-25

CBDT Guidelines for compulsory selection of return for compulsory scrutiny during FY 2024-25   CBDT Guidelines for compulsory selection of…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

High Court quashed reopening on the incorrect presumption that no return filed

High Court quashed reopening of assessment on the incorrect presumption that no return of income had been filed Re-assessment order…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

4 days ago