Income Tax

Addition made in the present year to WIP to be considered as opening stock next year – ITAT

Addition made in the present year to work-in-progress to be considered as opening stock next year-ITAT directs AO

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3018 (2019) (06) ITAT

The assessee was a private limited company engaged in civil construction. The Return of income of the company was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Subsequently the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) were issued.

The Assessing Officer (AO) while examining the work-in-progress, called the assessee to explain the basis of evaluation of work-in-progress (WIP) and the assessee submitted that the valuation of WIp in the form of boulders, sand and morumum dumped was only on estimation.

However, the AO based on the value of boulders, transport crushed, labour and other incidental costs, inter alia made an addition of Rs. 50 lakhs to the value of work-in-progress declared at Rs. 1.50 crores by the assessee.

Aggrieved by the order, the assessee has filed an appeal with the CIT(A). The CIT(A) has confirmed the addition of Rs.50 lakhs in respect of work-in progress.

Aggrieved by the order, the assessee approached the Tribunal.

The assessee submitted that the CIT(A) had erred in confirming the addition of valuation of work-in-progress of Rs. 50 lakhs.

The assessee further emphasized that Rs.50 lakhs addition made in said financial year shall be considered in the opening balance of the next year.

The Tribunal found reasonability in the contention that the AO had made addition of Rs. 50 lakhs to the work-in-progress on the estimated basis and the same had to be considered as opening balance in the subsequent assessment year.

The Tribunal concurred that the addition in the present year due to difference in valuation of stock for work-in-progress to be considered as opining stock next year.

Accordingly, the Tribunal allowed this ground and directed the AO to treat the opening stock in the next financial year.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Imparting education in gemmology, jewellery arts, designs qualifies for exemption u/s 11

Conducting courses in gemmology, jewellery arts, jewellery design amounts to imparting of education entitling assessee benefit of exemption u/s 11…

16 minutes ago
  • GST

Special procedure under Delhi GST Act for rectification of order for wrong ITC availment

Special procedure notified under Delhi GST Act 2017 for rectification of order confirming demand for wrong availment of ITC. Lt.…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT specifies work allocations and zonal charges of its members

CBDT specifies work allocations and zonal charges of its members CBDT has issued an office memorandum dated 03/12/2025 giving details…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO can’t make addition on his speculation and assumption of manipulation in share prices

Addition quashed as alleged manipulation in share prices was merely a speculation and assumption of Assessing Office In a recent…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assesee not deducting TDS due to stay by High Court can’t be treated as assessee in default

When assesee did not deduct TDS on account of interim stay of High Court, it can’t be regarded as assessee…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted where books of account not maintained – ITAT Allahabad

Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted in a case where books of account have not been maintained In a recent…

2 days ago