Income Tax

Addition made in the present year to WIP to be considered as opening stock next year – ITAT

Addition made in the present year to work-in-progress to be considered as opening stock next year-ITAT directs AO

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3018 (2019) (06) ITAT

The assessee was a private limited company engaged in civil construction. The Return of income of the company was processed u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Subsequently the case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) were issued.

The Assessing Officer (AO) while examining the work-in-progress, called the assessee to explain the basis of evaluation of work-in-progress (WIP) and the assessee submitted that the valuation of WIp in the form of boulders, sand and morumum dumped was only on estimation.

However, the AO based on the value of boulders, transport crushed, labour and other incidental costs, inter alia made an addition of Rs. 50 lakhs to the value of work-in-progress declared at Rs. 1.50 crores by the assessee.

Aggrieved by the order, the assessee has filed an appeal with the CIT(A). The CIT(A) has confirmed the addition of Rs.50 lakhs in respect of work-in progress.

Aggrieved by the order, the assessee approached the Tribunal.

The assessee submitted that the CIT(A) had erred in confirming the addition of valuation of work-in-progress of Rs. 50 lakhs.

The assessee further emphasized that Rs.50 lakhs addition made in said financial year shall be considered in the opening balance of the next year.

The Tribunal found reasonability in the contention that the AO had made addition of Rs. 50 lakhs to the work-in-progress on the estimated basis and the same had to be considered as opening balance in the subsequent assessment year.

The Tribunal concurred that the addition in the present year due to difference in valuation of stock for work-in-progress to be considered as opining stock next year.

Accordingly, the Tribunal allowed this ground and directed the AO to treat the opening stock in the next financial year.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

12 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

13 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago