Income Tax

Change in the jurisdiction of Pr. CIT Guwahati & Assam. Read Notification

Amendment in the jurisdiction of Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of Income-tax, Guwahati & Assam

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 6/2020

New Delhi, the 27th January, 2020

(Income-Tax)

S.O. 387(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following amendments in the notification of

Income-tax, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary Part II, section 3, Subsection (ii) vide number S.O. 2752(E), dated the 22nd October, 2014, namely :-

In the said notification, in the SCHEDULE-I,

(i) the Sl No. 113 and the entries relating thereto shall be omitted;

(ii) in Sl No. 112 for the entries relating thereto, the following entries shall be substituted:-

112

Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of Income-tax, Guwahati

Guwahati, Assam

(a) In the State of Assam : Districts of Kamrup (Metropolitan), Kamrup (Rural), Nagaon, Morigaon, Lakhimpur, Dhemaji, Sonitpur, Darrang, Udalguri, Nalbari, Barpeta, Bongaigaon, Dhubri, Baksa, Chirang, Goalpara, Kokrajhar, Hojai, South Salmara- Mankachar, and Biswanath;

b. In the State of Arunachal Pradesh : Districts of East Kameng, West Kameng, Tawang, Lower Subansiri, Upper Subansiri, Papum Pare, Kurung Kumey, Pakke-Kessang, Kra Daadi and Kamle

c. In the State of Meghalaya : Districts of East Garo Hills, West Garo Hills, South Garo Hills, North Garo Hills, and South West Garo Hills

a.        Persons other than companies deriving income from sources other than income from business or profession and residing within the territorial area mentioned in items (a), (b) and

(c) of Column (4);

b.        Persons other than companies deriving income from business or profession and whose principal place of abcaus.in business or profession is within the territorial area mentioned in items (a), (b) and (c) of Column (4);

c. Persons being companies registered under the Companies Act, 2013 or under the Companies Act, 1956 and having its registered office or having its principal place of business in the area mentioned in items (a), (b) and (c) of Column (4);

d. Persons being individuals referred to in item (b) of column (6)

 

(a)   All cases of the persons referred to in corresponding entries in items (a), (b) and

(c) of Column (5)

(b)  All cases of individuals being managing directors  or directors or managers or secretaries in the companies referred to in corresponding entry in item (c) of column (5)

2. This notification shall come into force from the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

[F. No. 187/02/2020 (ITA. I)]

GULZAR AHMAD WANI, Under Secy.

Download Notification Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago