Income Tax

Amendment to Instruction-Special Public Prosecutors Engagement (SPPs) to represent Income Tax before Courts of Session/subordinate courts

Amendment to Instruction-Special Public Prosecutors Engagement (SPPs) to represent Income Tax Department before Courts of Session/subordinate courts

F. No. 279/ Misc/M-77/ 2011-ITJ
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(A&J Division)

New Delhi, the 18th October, 2016

To
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax.

Madam/Sir,

Sub:Modifications to the Instruction No. 6/2016 for engagement of  Special Public Prosecutors (SPPs) to represent the Income Tax Department before Courts of Session and its subordinate courts- Reg.

Ref:- CBDT Instruction No. 6/2016 dated 7th September 2016.

Kindly refer to the above.

2. Instruction 6/2016 of CBDT (hereinafter “Instruction”) has revised the guidelines for engagement of Special Public Prosecutors(SPPs) to represent the Income Tax Department before various courts in supersession of the earlier Instruction No. 1880/1991 and Instruction No. 1925/1995 of the CBDT on the subject. Suggestions have been received from various authorities for modifications to the Instruction.

3. In this regard, after considering the suggestions received, the following modifications are hereby made to the Part B (Bill for appearance etc.,) of the Proforma ‘P4’ of the Instruction, by adding the rows 7, 8 & 9.

The Part B of the Proforma P4 of the Instruction after modification is as follows:

Part B (Bill for appearance etc.), as applicable

Amount (Rs.)

1 Substantial and effective hearing (Whether Connected case- Yes/ No)  
2 Non- effective hearing  
3 Conference fees  
4 Clerkage @}10%  
5 Out of pocket expenses (particulars to be given)  
6 For performing duties outside headquarters (as per para 3.4)  
7 Date of Judgement  
8 Date of furnishing the certified copy of the judgement to the office concerned  
9  Deduct 20% of (1. + 2.) above, if date at (8.) is more than 10 days (excluding the time taken by the courts) from the date at (7.)  
10 Total

4. These modifications may be brought to the notice of all the officers.

5. Hindi version of this will follow.

(K. Vamsi Krishna)
ACIT (OSD) (ITJ-II)
Tel:  26882637

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme

ITAT allows exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit the amount in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme and new asset…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition to be made in hands of assessee solely on basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet

Addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee solely on the basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet - ITAT In…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) dismissed beyond Rs. 3 lakhs

ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

2 days ago