Assistant Director, Income Tax (Investigation) sentenced to five years Rigorous Imprisonment with a fine of Rs. one lakh in a bribery case.
The Special Judge, CBI Cases, Dhanbad (Jharkhand) has sentenced Sh. Swarn Singh, then Assistant Director, Income Tax (Investigation), Dhanbad to undergo five years Rigorous Imprisonment with a fine of Rs. one lakh and Sh. Mrityunjay Kumar Chourasia, a private person to undergo five years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 50,000/- in a bribery case.
CBI had registered a case on 21.01.2004 U/s 120-B of IPC r/w 7, 8 and 10 of PC Act, 1988 on a complaint against Shri Swarn Singh, Assistant Director, Income Tax (Investigation), Dhanbad and Shri Mrityunjay Kumar Chourasia alias Tinku Chourasia (private person) for demanding an illegal gratification of Rs. 15,00,000/- from the complainant for showing favour in the preparation of a favourable Appraisal Report, releasing of frozen bank accounts and not causing further enquiry in the matter in which the Income Tax Department conducted raids in the business establishments, residences of complainant and his relatives. CBI laid a trap and caught Shri Swarn Singh and Shri Mrityunjay Kumar Chourasia red handed while demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,00,000/- as 1st instalment out of total bribe of Rs. 15,00,000/-.
After investigation, a chargesheet was filed on 21.03.2005 against said accused persons U/s 120-B of IPC & Section 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of PC Act, 1988. The Trial Court found the accused guilty and convicted them
----------- Similar Posts: -----------In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…
Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…
SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…
Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…
Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…
Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…