Assistant Director, Income Tax (Investigation) sentenced to five years Rigorous Imprisonment with a fine of Rs. one lakh in a bribery case.
The Special Judge, CBI Cases, Dhanbad (Jharkhand) has sentenced Sh. Swarn Singh, then Assistant Director, Income Tax (Investigation), Dhanbad to undergo five years Rigorous Imprisonment with a fine of Rs. one lakh and Sh. Mrityunjay Kumar Chourasia, a private person to undergo five years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 50,000/- in a bribery case.
CBI had registered a case on 21.01.2004 U/s 120-B of IPC r/w 7, 8 and 10 of PC Act, 1988 on a complaint against Shri Swarn Singh, Assistant Director, Income Tax (Investigation), Dhanbad and Shri Mrityunjay Kumar Chourasia alias Tinku Chourasia (private person) for demanding an illegal gratification of Rs. 15,00,000/- from the complainant for showing favour in the preparation of a favourable Appraisal Report, releasing of frozen bank accounts and not causing further enquiry in the matter in which the Income Tax Department conducted raids in the business establishments, residences of complainant and his relatives. CBI laid a trap and caught Shri Swarn Singh and Shri Mrityunjay Kumar Chourasia red handed while demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,00,000/- as 1st instalment out of total bribe of Rs. 15,00,000/-.
After investigation, a chargesheet was filed on 21.03.2005 against said accused persons U/s 120-B of IPC & Section 7 and 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of PC Act, 1988. The Trial Court found the accused guilty and convicted them
Empanelment to act as ICAI exam observers for January 2027 CA Examination. Last date to apply is 20.11.2026 Empanelment of…
No arrest under GST- Major decision taken in 57th Meeting of the GST Council on 8th October 2026 PRESS RELEASE…
A subsequent Apex Court ruling on the substantive issue cannot retrospectively make an act done in compliance of a binding…
Interest payment on mobilisation advance to NHAI not liable for deduction of tax at source u/s 194A - ITAT Interest…
Typographical error in turnover declared in ITR was not as a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 when AO…
Ground taken by assessee that he was not aware of the order cannot be brushed aside so lightly in absence…