Income Tax

Addition for cash deposit deleted as cash withdrawals, redeposit made during same year

Addition for cash deposit deleted as cash withdrawals, redeposit took place during the year itself, there was no question of making addition

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2978 (2019) (05) ITAT

The appeal by the assessee was directed against the order passed by the CIT(A) against the confirmation of addition of cash deposit on bank account.

The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment on the ground that the assessee deposited huge amount in his bank account and also made withdrawals as against that, the returned income was very low.

The assessee remained unrepresented before the AO. He, therefore, made an addition towards unexplained cash deposits in bank account.

The CIT(A) sustained the addition though give part relief by accepting the assessee’s explanation that the remaining amount represented his income from contracts on which the assessee had offered income under the presumptive scheme of taxation.

Aggrieved by such an addition, the assessee had approached the Tribunal.

The Tribunal observed that the assessee was a contractor who had received Rs. 39 lakhs approx after deduction of tax by cheque. He also received advance of Rs.10.00 lakh. The assessee was not maintaining any books of account and thus offered income u/s 44AD of the Income tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

It was noted that the assessee had withdrew the amount of contact income. As the advance of Rs.10.00 lakh received was to be returned since the assessee could not carry out the work in that respect, the assessee re-deposited Rs. 10.00 lakh cash in his bank account and thereafter, issued a cheque of equal amount towards refund.

The Tribunal noted that admittedly, a sum of Rs. 40 lakhs approx was withdrawn. As the assessee carried out the work only for a sum of Rs. 30 lakh, the excess amount of Rs. 10.00 lakh which was initially given as advance to the assessee was withdrawn by the assessee but redeposited in the same bank account for issuing a cheque towards refund.

The Tribunal opined that since, the transactions of receipt of amount, cash withdrawals, redeposit of cash and refund had taken place during the year itself, there could not be any question of making addition in respect of cash deposit.

Accordingly, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 10.00 lakh sustained by the CIT(A).

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

11 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago