Income Tax

CBDT amends Rule 10DA, 10DB and Form No. 3CEAB related to international or specified domestic transactions

CBDT amends Rule 10DA, 10DB and Form No. 3CEAB related to maintenance and furnishing of information by persons entering into international or specified domestic transactions

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
Department of Revenue
CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES

Notification No. 31/2021

New Delhi, the 5th April, 2021

Income-tax

G.S.R 250(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and sub-section (4) of section 92D and sub-section (8) of section 286 read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely: –

1. Short title and commencement. —(1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (9th Amendment) Rules, 2021.

(2) They shall come into force on the 1st day of April, 2021.

2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules), in rule 10DA,−

(a) in sub-rule (2), for the word “Commissioner”, the word “Director” shall be substituted;

(b) in sub-rule (4),−

(i) for the words “constituent entities resident in India of an international group” the words, brackets and figure “constituent entities of an international group required to file the information and document under sub-rule (2),” shall be substituted;

(ii) in clause (b), for the word “Commissioner”, the word “Director” shall be substituted.

3. In the principal rules, in rule 10DB, −

(a) for sub-rule (1) the following sub-rule shall be substituted, namely: −

“(1) The income-tax authority for the purposes of section 286 shall be the Joint Director as may be designated by the Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or the Director General of Income-tax (Systems), as the case may be.”;

(b) in sub-rule (6), for the words “five thousand five hundred” the words “six thousand four hundred” shall be substituted.

4. In the principal rules, in the Appendix II, in Form No. 3CEAB, in the heading, the words “, resident in India,” shall be omitted.

[F. No.370142/19/2019-TPL]

NEHA SAHAY,
Under Secy. (Tax Policy Legislation Division)

Explanatory Memorandum: It is hereby certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to this notification.

Note. The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) vide notification number S.O. 969(E), dated the 26th March, 1962 and was last amended vide notification number G.S.R 246(E), dated 1st April, 2021

Download Notification Click Here >>

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

13 hours ago

Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

2 days ago

Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

3 days ago

Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

3 days ago

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

5 days ago

Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

6 days ago