CBDT amends Rule 44E of Application for obtaining an Advance Ruling
CBDT has notified the Income-tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2023 amending the Rule 44E related to Application for obtaining an Advance Ruling.
The amendment seeks to prescribe mode and authorised signatory of the Application for different emtities, i.e company, firm, individual, HUF etc. Further it prescribes mode of furnishing of the application.
The following Forms have also been revised.
Form No. 34C
Form of application by a non-resident applicant for obtaining an advance ruling under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
FORM No. 34D
[See rule 44E]
Form of application by a resident applicant for seeking an advance ruling in relation to a transaction undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by him with a non-resident, under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
FORM No. 34DA
[See rule 44E]
Form of application by a resident applicant for seeking an advance ruling, in relation to a transaction which has been undertaken or is proposed to be undertaken, under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
FORM No. 34E
[See rule 44E]
Form of application by a resident falling within such class or category of persons as notified by Central Government for obtaining an advance ruling under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
FORM No. 34EA
[See rule 44E]
Form of application by a person for obtaining an advance ruling under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Penalty u/s 271B is not attracted in a case where books of account have not been maintained In a recent…
NALCO invites RFP for empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for verification of Stores/Spares and movable assets. NALCO has invited Request…
Sending or bringing currency of Nepal and Bhutan - RBI revises exiting regulations RBI has notified the Foreign Exchange Management…
Entire manufacturing process though by distinct units relevant for exemption from excise duty on account of manufacture without aid of…
High Court condoned delay in filing Form 10B as the failure was in the 1st Year of operation of the…
Penalty u/s 270A quashed as there was no satisfaction in the penalty order on what exactly was under reporting of…