Income Tax

CBDT amends Rule 44E – Application for obtaining an Advance Ruling

CBDT amends Rule 44E  of Application for obtaining an Advance Ruling

CBDT has notified the Income-tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2023 amending the Rule 44E related to Application for obtaining an Advance Ruling.

The amendment seeks to prescribe mode and authorised signatory of the Application for different emtities, i.e company, firm, individual, HUF etc. Further it prescribes mode of furnishing of the application.

The following Forms have also been revised.

Form No. 34C
Form of application by a non-resident applicant for obtaining an advance ruling under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

FORM No. 34D
[See rule 44E]
Form of application by a resident applicant for seeking an advance ruling in relation to a transaction undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by him with a non-resident, under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

FORM No. 34DA
[See rule 44E]
Form of application by a resident applicant for seeking an advance ruling, in relation to a transaction which has been undertaken or is proposed to be undertaken, under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

FORM No. 34E
[See rule 44E]
Form of application by a resident falling within such class or category of persons as notified by Central Government for obtaining an advance ruling under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

FORM No. 34EA
[See rule 44E]
Form of application by a person for obtaining an advance ruling under section 245Q(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961

Download CBDT Notification No. 37/2023 Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago