Income Tax

CBDT amends Safe Harbour Rules. Rule 10TD shall apply for AY 2020-21

CBDT amends Safe Harbour Rules. Rule 10TD shall apply for AY 2020-21

Safe Harbour Rules amended

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 25/2020

New Delhi, the 20th May, 2020
 
INCOME-TAX
 
G.S.R.304(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 read with sub-section (2) of section 92CB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:
 
1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (9th Amendment) Rules, 2020.
 
(2) They shall come into force and shall be deemed to have come into force from the 1st day of April, 2020.
 
2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962,—
 
(i) in rule 10TD, after sub-rule (3A), the following rule shall be inserted, namely:—
 
“(3B) The provisions of sub-rules (1) and (2A) shall apply for the assessment year 2020-21”;
 
(ii) in rule 10TE, in sub-rule (2), after the third proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely: 
 
“Provided also that nothing contained in this sub-rule shall apply to the option for safe harbour validly exercised under sub-rule (3B) of rule 10TD.”; and
 
(iii) in Appendix II, in Form No 3CEFA, in the heading, in the brackets, for the word and figure “rule 10” the word, figure and letters “rule 10TE” shall be substituted.
 
[F. No. 370142/14/2020-TPL]
 
NEHA SAHAY, Under Secy.(Tax Policy and Legislation)

 
Explanatory Memorandum:It is hereby certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to these rules.
 
Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, section-3, sub-section (ii) vide number S.O. 969 (E) dated the 26th March, 1962 and were last amended vide notification number GSR No. 282(E), dated the 06th May, 2020. 
 

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

1 day ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

1 day ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

2 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

3 days ago