Income Tax

CBDT amends Safe Harbour Rules. Rule 10TD shall apply for AY 2020-21

CBDT amends Safe Harbour Rules. Rule 10TD shall apply for AY 2020-21

Safe Harbour Rules amended

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 25/2020

New Delhi, the 20th May, 2020
 
INCOME-TAX
 
G.S.R.304(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 read with sub-section (2) of section 92CB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:
 
1. Short title and commencement.—(1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (9th Amendment) Rules, 2020.
 
(2) They shall come into force and shall be deemed to have come into force from the 1st day of April, 2020.
 
2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962,—
 
(i) in rule 10TD, after sub-rule (3A), the following rule shall be inserted, namely:—
 
“(3B) The provisions of sub-rules (1) and (2A) shall apply for the assessment year 2020-21”;
 
(ii) in rule 10TE, in sub-rule (2), after the third proviso, the following proviso shall be inserted, namely: 
 
“Provided also that nothing contained in this sub-rule shall apply to the option for safe harbour validly exercised under sub-rule (3B) of rule 10TD.”; and
 
(iii) in Appendix II, in Form No 3CEFA, in the heading, in the brackets, for the word and figure “rule 10” the word, figure and letters “rule 10TE” shall be substituted.
 
[F. No. 370142/14/2020-TPL]
 
NEHA SAHAY, Under Secy.(Tax Policy and Legislation)

 
Explanatory Memorandum:It is hereby certified that no person is being adversely affected by giving retrospective effect to these rules.
 
Note: The principal rules were published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, section-3, sub-section (ii) vide number S.O. 969 (E) dated the 26th March, 1962 and were last amended vide notification number GSR No. 282(E), dated the 06th May, 2020. 
 

Share

Recent Posts

  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

5 days ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST

Payment of imprest whether a transfer within the meaning of section 269ST – case remanded for determination In a recent…

1 week ago
  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

2 weeks ago