Income Tax

CBDT exempts income of Prayagraj Mela Pradhikaran u/s 10(46) of the Income-tax Act

CBDT exempts income of Prayagraj Mela Pradhikaran u/s 10(46) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for five years starting from assessment years 2019-2020

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 22 /2019

New Delhi, the 14th March, 2019

S.O. 1372(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies for the purposes of the said clause, ‘Prayagraj Mela Pradhikaran, Prayagraj’, an authority constituted by the State Government of Uttar Pradesh, in respect of the following specified income arising to that authority, namely:—

(a) Grant-in-aid received from any Central Government, State Government or other authority;

(b) Tolls on the parking of vehicle or entering any vehicle or any person bringing goods for sale or for demonstration/ advertisement into the Mela area;

(c) Fee on the registration of activity of business, trade or profession;

(d) Fee on the services provided to individual as service charge;

(e) Any other charge and fee in Mela Area levied by authority as per the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Prayagraj Mela Authority, Allahabad Act, 2017 (U. P. Act No. 5 of 2018); and

(f) Interest earned on (a) to (e) above.

2. This notification shall be effective subject to the conditions that Prayagraj Mela Pradhikaran, Prayagraj,—

(a) shall not engage in any commercial activity;

(b) activities and the nature of the specified income shall remain unchanged throughout the financial years; and

(c) shall file return of income in accordance with the provision of clause (g) of sub-section (4C) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

3. This notification shall apply with respect to the assessment years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 and 2023-2024.

[F. No. 300196/14/2019-ITA-I ]

RAJARAJESWARI R., Under Secy.

Share

Recent Posts

  • ICAI

CA Misconduct – Order quashed as judgment not passed by same members who heard arguments.

CA Misconduct – Appellate order quashed as final judgment was not passed by same members who heard arguments. In a…

18 hours ago
  • Insurance

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act – SC

Deceased homemaker can not be considered as dependant for award of compensation under MV Act. Courts to award a composite…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CIT notice u/s 263 quashed as AO rightly took DVO value of property as actual sale price

CIT Revision notice u/s 263 quashed as the Assessing Officer rightly taken DVO value of property sold as actual sale…

3 days ago
  • GST

Extension of timeline for implementation of Ship To GSTIN & Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities

Extension of timeline for implementation of mandatory "Ship To GSTIN" and Voluntary Closure of E-Way Bill functionalities GSTN Advisory dated…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

No protective addition required when additions is confirmed in hands of searched person – ITAT

No protective addition required in the hand of a third party when additions have been confirmed in the hands of…

4 days ago
  • arbitration

Limitation u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commences on disposal of application u/s 33 by Arbitral Tribunal – SC

Limitation for filing application u/s 34 of Arbitration Act commence from date on which application u/s 33 is disposed of…

1 week ago