CBDT exempts income of Prayagraj Mela Pradhikaran u/s 10(46) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for five years starting from assessment years 2019-2020
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
New Delhi, the 14th March, 2019
S.O. 1372(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies for the purposes of the said clause, ‘Prayagraj Mela Pradhikaran, Prayagraj’, an authority constituted by the State Government of Uttar Pradesh, in respect of the following specified income arising to that authority, namely:—
(a) Grant-in-aid received from any Central Government, State Government or other authority;
(b) Tolls on the parking of vehicle or entering any vehicle or any person bringing goods for sale or for demonstration/ advertisement into the Mela area;
(c) Fee on the registration of activity of business, trade or profession;
(d) Fee on the services provided to individual as service charge;
(e) Any other charge and fee in Mela Area levied by authority as per the provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Prayagraj Mela Authority, Allahabad Act, 2017 (U. P. Act No. 5 of 2018); and
(f) Interest earned on (a) to (e) above.
2. This notification shall be effective subject to the conditions that Prayagraj Mela Pradhikaran, Prayagraj,—
(a) shall not engage in any commercial activity;
(b) activities and the nature of the specified income shall remain unchanged throughout the financial years; and
(c) shall file return of income in accordance with the provision of clause (g) of sub-section (4C) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
3. This notification shall apply with respect to the assessment years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 and 2023-2024.
[F. No. 300196/14/2019-ITA-I ]
RAJARAJESWARI R., Under Secy.
----------- Similar Posts: -----------In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…
Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…
SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…
Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…
Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…
Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…