Income Tax

CBDT guidelines on eligibility of exemption under Section 10(23FE)

 
CBDT guidelines on eligibility of exemption under clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 
Central Board of Direct Taxes CBDT has issued Circular No. 19 of 2021 dated 26th October, 2021 giving guidelines under clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961
 
Finance Act, 2020, inter-alia, inserted clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to provide for exemption to sovereign wealth funds and pension funds (” specified fund”) on their income in the nature of dividend, interest and long-term capital gains arising from investment in infrastructure in India made between 01.04.2020 and 31.03.2024 subject to fulfilment of certain conditions.
 
The Finance Act, 2021, inter alia, inserted seventh proviso to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Act to provide that in case the specified fund has loans or borrowings, directly or indirectly, for the purposes of making investment in India, such fund shall be deemed to be not eligible for exemption under this clause.
 
In this regard, concerns have been raised in regard to the term ‘ indirectly’ used in the said proviso of the clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Act that it is not defined and no clarity has been provided thereon under the extant provisions. Further, concerns have been raised that if the specified fund or its holding entity or any other entity in the chain of holding or any associate thereof (“group concern”) has any loans or borrowings, the specified fund may be ineligible to get the exemption under the said clause.
 
First proviso to clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Act provides that if any difficulty arises regarding interpretation or implementation of the provisions of this clause, the Board may, with the approval of the Central Government, issue guidelines for the purpose of removing the difficulty.

CBDT guidelines on eligibility of exemption under clause (23FE) of section 10 

CBDT has issued the following guidelines:
 
It has been clarified that eligibility of exemption under clause (23FE) of section LO of the Act shall be as follows: –
 
 
(a) if the loans and borrowings have been taken by the specified fund or any of its group concern, specifically for the purposes of making investment by the specified fund in India, such fund shall not be eligible for exemption under clause (23FE) of section 10 of the Act; and
 
(b) if the loans and borrowings have been taken by the specified fund or any of its group concern, not specifically for the purposes of making investment in India, it shall not be presumed that the investment in India has been made out of such loans and borrowings and such specified fund shall be eligible for exemption under clause 23(FE) of section 10 of the Act, subject to the fulfilment of all other conditions under the said clause, provided that the source of the investment in India is not from such loans and borrowings.
 
----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

2 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

2 days ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

3 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

4 days ago