CBDT notified revised ICDS 2016 applicable from FY 2016-17. ICDS are not applicable to individual/huf not covered under tax audit u/s 44AB
Who is required to follow ICDS?
These income computation and disclosure standards (ICDS).are to be followed by all the assessees except:
(i) individual or a Hindu undivided family (HUF) who is not required to get his accounts tax audited u/s 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(ii) assessee following cash basis of accounting.
(iii) assessees not having any income under the head “Profits and gains of business or profession” or “Income from other sources”.
From which financial year the ICDS apply?
The revised ICDS apply to the financial year 2016-17 (assessment year 2017-18) and subsequent assessment years.
Number of ICDS notified
ICDS-I to ICDS-X has have been notified as under
ICDS-I | Accounting Policies | Click Here to download |
ICDS-II | Valuation of Inventories | Click Here to download |
ICDS-III | Construction Contracts | Click Here to download |
ICDS-IV | Revenue Recognition | Click Here to download |
ICDS-V | Tangible Fixed Assets | Click Here to download |
ICDS-VI | Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates | |
ICDS-VII | Governments Grants | |
ICDS-VIII | Securities | |
ICDS-IX | Borrowing Costs | |
ICDS-X | Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets | Click Here to download |
Download CBDT Notified Revised ICDS 2016 Click Here >>
There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand …
Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…