Income Tax

CBDT notifies 7 Andhra Pradesh districts for tax incentives u/s 32(1)(iia) and section 32AD of the Income-tax Act

CBDT notifies 7 Andhra Pradesh districts for tax incentives u/s 32(1)(iia) and section 32AD 

Under the Andhra Pradesh Re-organisation Act, 2014 the Government of India is extending special assistance to four districts of Rayalseema and three districts of North coastal Region of Andhra Pradesh. To further boost the industrial activities, the CBDT has notified these seven districts for availing tax incentives under section 32(1)(iia) and section 32AD of the Income-tax Act.

Accordingly, any manufacturing undertaking set up during the period from 01.04.2015 to 31.03.2020 in these districts of Andhra Pradesh is eligible for 15% of higher additional depreciation and 15% of   investment allowance on the cost of plant and machinery acquired by it during the said period. 

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Income-tax Notification No. 85 /2016

New Delhi, the 28th September, 2016

S.O. 3075 (E).— In exercise of the powers conferred by section 32 and section 32AD of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies the following districts of the State of Andhra Pradesh as backward areas under the first proviso to clause (iia) of sub-section (1) of section 32 and sub-section (1) of section 32AD of the said Act, namely:—

1. Anantapur

2. Chittoor

3. Cuddapah

4. Kurnool

5. Srikakulam

6. Vishakhapatnam

7. Vizianagaram

2. This notification shall come into force on the date of its publication in the Official Gazette.

[F.No.142/13/2015-TPL]

PITAMBAR DAS,
Director (Tax Policy & Legislation)

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

1 day ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Unless medical certificate are held forged & fictitious, appeal can’t be rejected on ground of delay

Where medical certificate not held to be forged and fictitious, rejecting appeal on ground of delay unjustified In a recent…

4 days ago
  • DGFT

One Star Export House status allowed based on export performance in two FYs

FTP 2023 amended to allow One Star Export House status to applicants (other than for Gems & Jewelry Sector) based…

5 days ago