Income Tax

CBDT notifies Form No. 26QF TDS statement under section 194S

 
CBDT notifies Form No. 26QF TDS statement under section 194S for TDS on transfer of a virtual digital asset 
 
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
 

Notification No. 73/2022

 
New Delhi, the 30th June, 2022
INCOME-TAX
 
G.S.R.482(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by section 295 read with section 194S of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes, hereby, makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely:-
 
1. Short title and commencement.––(1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (20thAmendment) Rules, 2022.
 
(2) They shall come into force from 1st day of July, 2022.
 
2. In the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the principal rules), in rule 31A, ––
 
(i) after sub-rule (1), the following shall be inserted, namely:-
 
“Provided that where the exchange has, in accordance with the guidelines issued under sub-section (6) of section 194S, agreed to pay tax in relation to a transaction of transfer of a virtual digital asset, owned by it as an alternative to tax required to be deducted by the buyer of such asset under section 194S, the Exchange shall deliver or cause to be delivered, a quarterly statement of such transactions in Form No. 26QF to the Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or the person authorised by the Principal Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or the Director General of Income-tax (Systems).
 
Explanation: For the purposes of this sub-rule,––
 
(i) “Exchange” means a person that operates an application or platform for transferring of virtual digital assets, which matches buy and sell trades and execute the same on their application or platform;
 
(ii) “virtual digital asset” shall have same meaning as assigned to itin clause (47A) of section 2.”
 
(ii) after sub-rule (4D), the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely,––
 
“(4E) The exchange referred to sub-rule (1) shall, at the time of preparing of quarterly statement in Form No. 26QF, furnish particulars of account paid or credited on which tax was not deducted in accordance with guidelines issued under sub-section (6) of section 194S.”.
 
3. In the principal rules, in Appendix II, after Form No. 26QE, the following Form shall be inserted, namely:–
 
Form No. 26QF
Quarterly statement of tax deposited in relation to transfer of virtual digital asset under section 194S to be furnished by an exchange for the quarter ending ………. June/ September/ December/ March
[section 194S, rule 31A(1) and (4E)]
 

Download CBDT Notification No. 73/2022 Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

1 hour ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

2 hours ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

17 hours ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

2 days ago