CBDT withdraws controversial Circular No. 10/2018 on applicability of section 56(2)(viia) for shares issued by company in which public not substantially interested
F. No . 173/616/2018-ITA-I
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(ITA-I Division)
Circular No. 02/2019
New Delhi, the 04 January, 2019
Reference is invited to the Circular No. 10/2018 dated 31.12.2018 on the captioned subject.
2. It has been brought to the notice of the Board that the matter relating to interpretation of the term “receives” used in section 56(2)(viia) of the lncome-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is subjudice in certain higher judicial forums.
Further, representations have been received from stakeholders seeking clarification on other similar provisions in section 56 of the Act.
3. Accordingly, the matter has been reconsidered by the Board. Given the fact that the matter relating to interpretation of the term ‘receives’ used in section 56(2)(viia) of the Act is pending before judicial forums and stakeholders have sought clarifications on similar provisions in section 56 of the Act, the Board is of the view that the matter is required to be examined afresh so that a comprehensive circular on the matter can be issued.
4. In view of the above, the Circular 10/2018 dated 31st December, 2018 issued from file No. 173/616/2018-ITA-I is hereby withdrawn and the said circular shall be considered to have been never issued.
5. A fresh comprehensive circular on the subject shall be issued in due course.
(Rajarajeswari R)
Under Secretary to the Government of India
…………..End of circular …………….
Authors Note:
The CBDT had issued the said Circular No. 10/2018 dated 31.12.2018 in which it was clarified that section 56(2)(viia) is an anti-abuse provision which applies only to the transfer of shares for no or inadequate consideration and not to a fresh issuance of shares.
Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…
In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…
For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…
Where medical certificate not held to be forged and fictitious, rejecting appeal on ground of delay unjustified In a recent…
FTP 2023 amended to allow One Star Export House status to applicants (other than for Gems & Jewelry Sector) based…
Agricultural land is outside the definition of capital asset, therefore, the deeming provision u/s 56(2)(x) cannot be invoked - ITAT…