Income Tax

Concealment penalty for not offering LFC/LTC to tax under bonafide belief that it was exempt deleted

Concealment penalty for not offering LFC/LTC reimbursement to tax under bonafide belief that it was exempt as the employer did not deduct tax at source, deleted

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2637 (2018) (11) ITAT

The appeal was preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax [Appeals] in confirming the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

The assessment of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 / 148 because the Assessing Officer (AO) found that the assessee has not included the amount of Leave Fare Concession ( LFC ) / Leave Travel Concession ( LTC ) received from its employers in its income and the same was claimed to be exempt u/s 10(5) of the Act.

The reassessment was completed after making the addition of LFC/LTC received from the employer. Penalty proceedings were separately initiated.

During the course of penalty proceedings, the assessee contended that since his employer bank did not deduct tax at source on the LFC/LTC payment, the assessee was under bonafide belief that the same was exempt.

The contention of the assessee did not find favour with the Assessing Officer who proceeded by levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. The assessee carried the matter before the CIT(A), but without any success.

The Tribunal observed that there was no dispute that the employer Bank did not deduct tax at source on reimbursement of LFC/LTC and it cannot be ruled out that the assessee was under bonafide belief that the same is exempt from tax. Otherwise, the employer would have deducted tax at source.

The Tribunal opined that it could not be stated that the assessee had concealed its particulars of income or has furnished inaccurate particulars of income.

Considering the circumstances under which the assessee formed bonafide belief, the Tribunal opined that this was not a fit case for levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.

Accordingly, the Assessing Officer was directed to delete the penalty levied.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Section 148 of it Act after 01.04.2021, not require recording reason to believe

Section 148 of Income Tax Act after 01.04.2021, does not even require recording reason to believe. In a recent judgment,…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Income Tax Deptt. Lucknow to hire Young Professional for assisting before ITAT

Income Tax Department, Lucknow is hiring Young Professional for assisting the Departmental Officers posted in various benches of ITAT, Lucknow…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Burden of proof on assessee to adduce evidence that land sold is agricultural

Burden of proof is on assessee to adduce cogent evidence that land sold was an agricultural land – Supreme Court…

19 hours ago
  • GST

Civil Court decreed refund of FD given as security deposit for registration in VAT era

Civil Court decreed refund of security deposit of VAT era as in GST Regime there is no requirement of security…

20 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Pursuing rectification u/s 154 is reasonable cause for condonation of delay in filing appeal

Pursuing remedy through rectification application u/s 154 within time, is a reasonable cause for condonation of delay in filing of…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Allowability of depreciation on highway project awarded on DBOT basis

ITAT allows depreciation on highway project awarded on DBOT basis In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi allows depreciation on highway…

2 days ago