Income Tax

Cost of Acquisition as on 1.4.2001 for properties purchased prior to 2001- Clarification

CBDT has clarified the question as to what would be the Cost of Acquisition as on 1.4.2001 for properties purchased prior to 2001 under new Capital Gain Tax Regime.

With introduction of new Capital Gain Tax Regime by Union Budget 2024-25, many doubts have arisen. CBDT has recently issued  13 FAQ to answer these doubts. An issue has been raised as to what would be the Cost of Acquisition as on 1.4.2001 for properties purchased prior to 2001. CBDT has answered it as under:

For properties (land or building or both) purchased prior to 1.4.2001, the cost of acquisition as on 1.4.2001 shall be:-

(i) Cost of Acquisition of the asset to the assesse; or

(ii) the Fair Market Value (not exceeding the stamp duty value, wherever available) of such asset as on 1.4.2001.

Taxpayers can choose either option as per section 55(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

An illustration to explain the same is as under:

S. No. Particulars Amount
1. Cost of acquisition of property in 1990 5 Lakhs
2. Stamp duty value as on 01.04.2001 10 Lakhs
3. Fair market Value (FMV) of the property as on 01.04.2001 12 Lakhs
4. Sale Consideration – Property sold on or after 23.07.2024 1 Crore
5. Cost of acquisition of property as on 01.04.2001 (Lower of stamp duty value or FMV) 10 Lakhs
6. Indexed cost of acquisition in FY 2024-25 = 10×363/100 36.3 Lakhs

 

LTCG (Old) Tax (Old) @ 20% LTCG (New) Tax (New) @ 12.50%
63.7 Lakhs 12.74 Lakhs 90 Lakhs 11.25 Lakhs

The taxpayer will have the option to avail roll over benefits for saving of tax

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Advisory for FORM GSTR-1A for furnishing details of outward supplies

Advisory for FORM GSTR-1A- Form and manner of furnishing details of outward supplies GSTN has issued an advisory for FORM…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No Penalty u/s 271E on cash repayment of advances treated unexplained cash credits

Penalty u/s 271E can not be imposed on cash repayment of advances treated as unexplained cash credits. In a recent…

12 hours ago
  • GST

Mining Royalty is not a tax – Supreme Court Nine Judges Bench approves decision in Kesoram

Mining Royalty is not a tax – Supreme Court Nine Judges Bench approves decision In Kesoram Industries and held that…

14 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee has right to get complete statements recorded against him – High Court

Assessee has right to get complete statements recorded against him and relied upon by the Income Tax Department  during the…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CBDT issues FAQs on new capital gains tax regime proposed in Union Budget 2024-25

CBDT issues 13 FAQs on new Capital Gain Tax Regime proposed in Union Budget 2024-25 Union Budget 2024-25 has proposed…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

Payment by corporate guarantor does not extinguish liability of corporate debtor – SC

Payment by corporate guarantor does not extinguish liability of corporate debtor to pay the entire amount payable - SC In…

2 days ago