Deduction u/s 35(2AB) allowed as Form 3CL was issued late by the competent authority . Form 3CL issued by competent authority can not be ignored – ITAT
ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3743 (2023) (05) ITAT
In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) in confirming disallowance of deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
The appellant assessee was a resident corporate entity engaged in manufacturing. For the assessment year under dispute, the assessee filed its return of income claiming deduction under section 35(2AB) of the Act in respect of research and development expenditure.
While examining assessee’s claim of deduction in course of assessment proceeding, the Assessing Officer observed that though the assessee had submitted Form 3CLA and 3CK for the impugned assessment year, however, it had not submitted Form 3CL.
As a result, the Assessing Officer disallowed deduction claimed under section 35(2AB) of the Act.
In first appeal proceeding the assessee furnished Form 3CL issued by the competent authority. However, it was completely ignored by the first appellate authority while confirming the addition.
The Tribunal observed that as per the Assessing Officer’s own admission, in course of assessment proceeding the assessee did furnish Form 3CLA and Form 3CK for the impugned assessment year. The disallowance was made only because Form 3CL was not furnished.
The Tribunal further observed that there was no doubt regarding the genuineness of the expenditure claimed as the Assessing Officer had allowed 100% deduction of revenue expenditure related to research and development. He only disallowed the excess deduction claimed under section 35(2AB) of the Act.
The Tribunal also noted that after completion of assessment the assessee did receive Form 3CL issued by the competent authority. However, while deciding the appeal, the first appellate authority completely ignored Form 3CL though, it was placed on the record.
The Tribunal opined that when the competent authority has issued Form 3CL entitling the assessee to claim deduction in respect of both capital and revenue expenditure, which is a mandate under section 35(2AB) of the Act, the departmental authorities cannot disentitle the assessee from availing the deduction by ignoring Form 3CL. Hence, disallowance was unsustainable.
Accordingly, the ITAT deleted the disallowance.
After holding that the cash receipts and cash payments are unexplained, ad-hoc estimation of income can not be adopted –…
Dividing total turnover by 365 days and concluding that assessee could not have made such cash sale on a single…
NERIST Arunachal Pradesh invites EoI for Empanelment of Chartered Accountant firm North Eastern Regional Institute of Science and Technology, (NERIST)…
Sibsagar University invites Expression of Interest (EOI) for Appointment of Internal Auditor Sibsagar University invites Expression of Interest (EOI) from reputed…
In a recent judgment Andhra Pradesh High Court struck down Section 147A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as unconstitutional.…
Bank was liable to pay compensation to borrower as it did not verify the progress of construction before loan disbursals…