Income Tax

Deduction u/s 57(iv) allowed despite assessee was engaged in business of real estate

Deduction u/s 57(iv) allowable against Interest received on enhanced compensation for land acquisition despite assessee engaged in business of real estate.

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3728 (2023) (05) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in in rejecting the claim of 50% deduction u/s 57(iv) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) in respect of interest on enhanced compensation by treating the same under the head “Profit and Gains of Business & Profession” as against “Income from Other Sources”.

The appellant assessee was a real estate developer company. In the return of income it claimed a deduction @ 50% under Section 57(iv) of the Act, in respect of interest received on enhanced compensation for acquisition of land by the Government.

The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the claim of deduction u/s 57(iv) of the Act, on ground that as the appellant was in the business of real estate, the interest income arising from compulsory acquisition of property is taxable under the head PGBP and not income from other sources.

Hence, the Assessing Officer accordingly held that as the interest income was not chargeable to tax U/s 56, the claim of deduction u/s 57(iv) of the Act was not admissible.  

The CIT(A) upheld the order of the Assessing Officer. Against which the assessee was in appeal before the ITAT.

The assessee submitted that the impugned disallowance of claim of deduction u/s 57(iv) was misconceived and without proper appreciation of the specific provision of Section 56(2)(viii) read with Section 57(iv) of the Act.  

It was further submitted that the fact that the assessee was engaged in the business of real estate was neither relevant nor will override the specific provision of section.

The Tribunal observed that section 56(2)(viii) provides that interest on enhanced compensation has to be taxed under the head “Income from other source. The ITAT agreed with the assessee in that the deduction u/s 57(iv) is to be allowed and the ground on which revenue  authorities disallowed the claim being the assessee engaged in business is of no relevance.

The Tribunal opined that in view of the overriding provision of Section 56(2)(viii) read with Section 57(iv) of the Act, the assessee was entitled to the statutory deduction of 50% U/s 57(iv) of the Act. 

Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the orders of the authorities below and decided the issue in favour of the Assessee.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Under POCM, selling/Admin costs allowable despite no revenue declared – ITAT

Under percentage completion method, selling/Admin costs are allowable despite no revenue declared as per guidance note of ICAI. In a…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO can’t use reverse computation using TDS amount for disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia)

AO cannot use reverse computation of gross payment using TDS amount to determine the amount disallowable u/s 40(a)(ia) - ITAT…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Once loans is repaid in subsequent years, addition u/s 68 cannot be made

Once loans were repaid in subsequent assessment years with cogent evidences then the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax…

2 days ago
  • Government

Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar & Ajeevika Mission-Gramin “VB-GRAM-G” notified

Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar & Ajeevika Mission (Gramin), In short VB-GRAM-G notified Government has notified Viksit Bharat Guarantee for…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

In denovo assessment , AO to apply independent mind without influenced by remarks

Once PCIT restores assessment to AO for denovo consideration, AO is obliged to independently apply mind without influenced by the…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Stock items of different value cannot be taken as basis for computing stock position

When value of items traded differs it cannot be taken as basis for computing the stock position specially when quantitative…

3 days ago