Deemed dividend to be taxed in the hands of individual shareholder and not in the hands of Partnership Firm in which he is partner
ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3638 (2023) (01) HC
In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT/Tribunal) confirming taxation of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) in the hands of Partnership firm and not the individual shareholder.
The question of law framed was as to whether the deemed dividend paid should be taxed in the hands of the Individual Director shareholder or in the hands of the appellant firm of which he was a partner?
The appellant assessee was a Partnership Firm. The said Firm had four partners one of whom had contributed 20% of the shares of the Firm. The said partner was also a director and substantial shareholder of a Limited company.
The said company gave a unsecured loan to the Partnership Firm. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated the unsecured loan as a deemed dividend in the hands of the Firm and added it to the income of the Firm invoking Section 2(22)(e) of the Act.
The CIT(A) allowed the assessee’s appeal and held that in terms of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act, the amount could be treated as deemed dividend only in the hands of shareholder since he is the beneficial owner of the shares in the said company.
On Revenue’s appeal, the ITAT by the impugned order remanded the matter to the CIT(A) on the ground that it was not clear whether deemed dividend should be taxed in the hands of the assessee or in the hands of the firm.
However, the Hon’ble High Court opined that a plain reading of the section 2(22)(e) indicates that the taxing of the deemed dividend has to be in the hands of the shareholder.
The Hon’ble High Court observed that in the present case, admittedly the partner of the firm held the shares in his individual capacity. On the other hand the Firm, did not hold any shares in the company.
The Hon’ble High Court opined that the CIT(A) was right in his conclusion.
The Hon’ble High Court stated that since the plain reading of Section 2(22)(e) of the Act makes it clear that the deemed dividend is to be taxed in the hands of individual shareholder and not an entity which does not hold shares, the question of remanding the matter to the CIT(A) did not arise.
Accordingly, the question framed was answered in favour of the Assessee and against the Department by holding that the deemed dividend should be taxed in the hands of individual Director of the company and not in the hands of the Appellant Partnership Firm.
Mere CBDT Instructions cannot absolve individuals of their obligation to explain the source and nature of their gold holdings, even…
Empanelment of General Observers for ICSI Examinations December 2026 ICSI has invited interested members to enroll as General Observers for…
ITAT answers some important and inter-related issues relating to deduction u/s 80IA In a recent judgment, ITAT has dealt with…
Carry forward of loss can not be denied for belated return, it is only the set off in subsequent year…
Where sales are duly recorded in books and VAT returns, to treat it bogus sales, AO must bringing cogent adverse…
Expenses to celebrate Diwali with staff creates a goodwill and, therefore amounts to expenses incurred for the purpose of business…