All pending appeals with CIT-A having tax effect of Rs 50 crore or more to be disposed off till 31st December 2017 as per Central Action Plan of FY 2017-18
Dy. No. 683/CIT(A&J)/2015
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board Direct Taxes
New Delhi, 12th October, 2017
To
All Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax,
Sir,
Sub: – Disposal of High Tax Effect cases having tax effect more than Rs. 50 Cr. reg.
Ref: – Dy. No. 683/CIT(A&J)/2015 –Vol-II dated 17.08.2017 (Copy enclosed).
Kindly refer to the above:
2. Vide letter under reference, it was communicated that on ITBA module, 1169 High Tax effect cases having disputed tax effect above 50 crore are pending with CIT(A) as on 01/04/2017. Region wise list of these cases have also been sent through this letter.
3. As per the Central Action Plan issued for the F. Y. 2017-18, all pending appeals having tax effect of Rs. 50 crore or more are to be dispose of up to 31st December,2017 as mentioned at Para (i) of Action Plan of chapter-III of the Central Action Plan which is reproduced as under: –
4 . But due to some typographical mistake, the date for disposal of all pending appeals having tax effect of Rs. 50 crore or more was wrongly written as March, 2018 in place of 31st December,2017 in the above mentioned letter .
5. Undersigned is therefore directed to request to disposed of all pending appeals having tax effect more than 50 core upto 31st December,2017
6. This issues with the approval of CIT (A&J).
Yours faithfully
End: as above
D .S. Rathi
DCIT (OSD) (ITJ)
CBDT
Tele : 011-26882637
Copy to: Data Base Cell for uploading on irsofficersonline.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…