e-filed forms 10A 10G time barring on 31082016 which were filed during 01-02-2016 to 29-02-2016. Instruction for taking necessary action.
DIRECTORATE OF INCOME TAX (SYSTEMS)
ARA Center, Ground Floor, E-2, Jhandewalan Extension,
New Delhi- 110055
F. No. System/ITBA/Exemption Module/e-filing/2016-17/7535 Dated:19/08/2016
To
All the Principal Commissioners of lncome-tax/CsIT (Exemption) (By Name)
Subject: E-filed exemption forms time barring on 31st August 2016- Reg.
Sir/Madam,
Kindly refer to the subject mentioned above. The assesses applying for registration/ approval under section 12AA, BOG and 10(23C)(iv), (v), (vi) & (via) have option to apply in form 10A/ 10G/ 56/ 560 of the I. T. Rules, 1962 either manually or through e-filing.
2. The e-filed forms 10A and 10G filed during the period 01.02.2016 to 29.02.2016, the orders in respect of which will get barred by limitation on 31.08.2016, have been e mailed to the concerned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)/ CIT (Exemption) on their official designation based e-mail addresses in PDF files. You are requested to download the e-forms relating to your charge and take necessary action as per law. The e-filed forms have been pushed to the concerned PCIT/CIT (Exemption) wherever the PAN jurisdiction of the applicant lied with a PCIT (Exemption) and in cases where the PAN jurisdiction of the applicant lies elsewhere, the form has been pushed to the PCIT (Exemption) of that region. In case it is felt that the recipient PCIT (Exemption) does not have jurisdiction to pass an order u/s 12AA/ 80G over an applicant, the recipient PCIT (Exemption) is requested to transfer the application to the PCIT having necessary jurisdiction.
3. There are no e-filed form 56 and 56D getting time barred on 31.08.2016.
4. The e-filed forms 10A, 10G, 56 and 56D getting barred by limitation on 30.09.2016 shall be e-mailed soon.
Yours faifthfully,
(Ramesh Krishnamurthi)
Addl. DGIT(S)-3, New Delhi
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…
Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…
ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee In a recent…