Income Tax

Entrance fee received by Club capital receipt not revenue. SC dismissed SLP of Department

Entrance fee received by Club capital receipt not revenue. Supreme Court dismissed SLP of the Income Tax Department

ABCAUS Case Law Citation
ABCAUS 3634 (2023) (01) SC

Important Case Laws relied upon:
CIT vs. Diners Business Services Pvt. Ltd 263 ITR 1 (Bom.)

In the instant case. SLP was filed by the Income Tax Department challenging the decision of the Hon’ble High Court in treating the entrance fees received by a Club from its member as capital receipts as against revenue receipt.

The respondent assessee was a Club running the race course.  During the relevant assessment year and in the years prior thereto, the assessee used to receive entrance fee amounts from Life Members, Club and Stand Members, Service Members and Local Members.  

In the year in question, the assessee had credited a large amount to the General Reserves and had not offered the same for taxation claiming it to be a capital receipt.  

However, the Assessing Officer disallowed the same and added it to the heads of income as revenue receipts.

The CIT(A) allowed the appeal following the principle of judicial consistency as previously also it was held as capital receipt.

The Tribunal noted that there was no dispute to the fact that right from practically the date of incorporation, the entrance   fee from the members was treated as capital in nature and majority of these orders were passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

Following High Court judgment, the Tribunal held that any sum paid by a member to acquire the rights of a club is a capital receipt.  

The Hon’ble High Court held that Tribunal had not committed any perversity or applied incorrect principles to the  given facts and when the facts and properly analysed circumstances and applied correct test to decide the issue at hand.

The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the appeal of the Revenue as lacking any substantial question of law.

Aggrieved by the order of the High Court, the Revenue filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

However, the Hon’ble Supreme Court declined to entertain the Special Leave Petition and dismissed it.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago