Income Tax

eTDS FVU version 2.146 (FY 2007-08 to 2009-10) and FVU version 5.0 for FY 2010-11 onwards effective from 13/04/2016

Download TDS e-Validation Utility (FVU) version 2.146 (to validate statement(s) pertaining to FY 2007-08 to 2009-10) and FVU version 5.0 (to validate statement(s) pertaining to FY 2010-11 onwards) 

Key Features – File Validation Utility (FVU) version 2.146

Incorporation of TAN and TAN name in the Challan Status Inquiry (i.e. .CSI) file and verification with the TDS/TCS statement during the time of validation through the FVU.

o TAN: In case, the TAN of the Deductor/Collector as per .CSI file does not match with the TAN as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will reject the TDS/TCS file and appropriate error message (Mismatch in present in the statement and .CSI file imported, kindly provide valid TAN) will be displayed to the user on validating the file through FVU.

o TAN Name: In case, the TAN Name (i.e. Name of Deductor/Collector) as per .CSI file does not match with the name as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will generate a displayed popup message as “Name of deductor in the statement should exactly match the Name of deductor as per TAN Master Database of ITD.”

Mandatory to mention Email IDs of deductor/collector and responsible person in TDS/TCS Statement.

o One of e-mail ids of Deductor/Collector or responsible person is required to be provided in the statement.

Change of State name from “ORISSA” to “ODISHA”.

This version of FVU is applicable with effect from April 13, 2016.

Download e-TDS/TCS FVU.exe (Version 2.146) Click Here >>

Key Features – File Validation Utility (FVU) version 5.0

Remark ‘B’ is made applicable for Section code 192A (Payment of accumulated balance due to an employee) for Form 26Q.

New Section code 194IA (Payment on transfer of certain immovable property other than agricultural land) has been added under list of sections available under Form 26Q.

Incorporation of TAN and TAN name in the Challan Status Inquiry (i.e. .CSI) file and verification with the TDS/TCS statement during the time of validation through the FVU.

o TAN: In case, the TAN of the Deductor/Collector as per .CSI file does not match with the TAN as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will reject the TDS/TCS file and appropriate error message (Mismatch in present in the statement and .CSI file imported, kindly provide valid TAN) will be displayed to the user on validating the file through FVU.

o TAN Name: In case, the TAN Name (i.e. Name of Deductor/Collector) as per .CSI file does not match with the name as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will generate a displayed popup message as “Name of deductor in the statement should exactly match the Name of deductor as per TAN Master Database of ITD.”

Mandatory to mention Email ID and mobile number of deductor/collector and responsible person in TDS/TCS Statement.

o One of e-mail ids of Deductor/Collector or responsible person is required to be provided in the statement.

o The value in the field ‘Mobile Number of responsible person’ is mandatory.

Change of State name from “ORISSA” to “ODISHA”.

This version of FVU is applicable with effect from April 13, 2016.

Download e-TDS/TCS FVU.exe (Version 5.0) Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

CBDT extends cut off date for investment by Sovereign Wealth Funds/Pension Funds

CBDT extends cut off date for investment by Twelve sovereign wealth funds / Pension Funds from 31st March 2024 to…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

HC dismissed appeal against inadequacy of sentence in income tax prosecution cases

Appeal against inadequacy of sentence passed by special court in income tax prosecution cases dismissed by High Court  In a…

1 day ago
  • ICSI

ICSI launches CS Mitr Scheme to give incentive for student registrations

ICSI launches CS Mitr Scheme to give incentive for getting student registered in Executive Programme ICSI has launched CS Mitr…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

CPC order u/s 143(1) is appealable and hence no merger with order u/s 143(3) – ITAT

CPC order u/s 143(1) is appealable and hence the doctrine of merger with order u/s 143(3) do not arise -…

2 days ago
  • GST

Under GST Act, there is no specific provision to disclose route of transportation of goods

Under GST Act, there is no specific provision which bounds selling dealer to disclose route to be taken during transportation…

2 days ago
  • Companies Act

Restrictions on use of words “Nidhi Limited”-The Nidhi (Amendment) Rules, 2024

Restrictions on use of words Nidhi Limited unless declared as such under section 406(1). Nidhi (Amendment) Rules 2024 MINISTRY OF…

2 days ago