Income Tax

eTDS FVU version 2.146 (FY 2007-08 to 2009-10) and FVU version 5.0 for FY 2010-11 onwards effective from 13/04/2016

Download TDS e-Validation Utility (FVU) version 2.146 (to validate statement(s) pertaining to FY 2007-08 to 2009-10) and FVU version 5.0 (to validate statement(s) pertaining to FY 2010-11 onwards) 

Key Features – File Validation Utility (FVU) version 2.146

Incorporation of TAN and TAN name in the Challan Status Inquiry (i.e. .CSI) file and verification with the TDS/TCS statement during the time of validation through the FVU.

o TAN: In case, the TAN of the Deductor/Collector as per .CSI file does not match with the TAN as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will reject the TDS/TCS file and appropriate error message (Mismatch in present in the statement and .CSI file imported, kindly provide valid TAN) will be displayed to the user on validating the file through FVU.

o TAN Name: In case, the TAN Name (i.e. Name of Deductor/Collector) as per .CSI file does not match with the name as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will generate a displayed popup message as “Name of deductor in the statement should exactly match the Name of deductor as per TAN Master Database of ITD.”

Mandatory to mention Email IDs of deductor/collector and responsible person in TDS/TCS Statement.

o One of e-mail ids of Deductor/Collector or responsible person is required to be provided in the statement.

Change of State name from “ORISSA” to “ODISHA”.

This version of FVU is applicable with effect from April 13, 2016.

Download e-TDS/TCS FVU.exe (Version 2.146) Click Here >>

Key Features – File Validation Utility (FVU) version 5.0

Remark ‘B’ is made applicable for Section code 192A (Payment of accumulated balance due to an employee) for Form 26Q.

New Section code 194IA (Payment on transfer of certain immovable property other than agricultural land) has been added under list of sections available under Form 26Q.

Incorporation of TAN and TAN name in the Challan Status Inquiry (i.e. .CSI) file and verification with the TDS/TCS statement during the time of validation through the FVU.

o TAN: In case, the TAN of the Deductor/Collector as per .CSI file does not match with the TAN as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will reject the TDS/TCS file and appropriate error message (Mismatch in present in the statement and .CSI file imported, kindly provide valid TAN) will be displayed to the user on validating the file through FVU.

o TAN Name: In case, the TAN Name (i.e. Name of Deductor/Collector) as per .CSI file does not match with the name as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will generate a displayed popup message as “Name of deductor in the statement should exactly match the Name of deductor as per TAN Master Database of ITD.”

Mandatory to mention Email ID and mobile number of deductor/collector and responsible person in TDS/TCS Statement.

o One of e-mail ids of Deductor/Collector or responsible person is required to be provided in the statement.

o The value in the field ‘Mobile Number of responsible person’ is mandatory.

Change of State name from “ORISSA” to “ODISHA”.

This version of FVU is applicable with effect from April 13, 2016.

Download e-TDS/TCS FVU.exe (Version 5.0) Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

1 hour ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

2 hours ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

17 hours ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

17 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

2 days ago