Income Tax

eTDS FVU version 2.146 (FY 2007-08 to 2009-10) and FVU version 5.0 for FY 2010-11 onwards effective from 13/04/2016

Download TDS e-Validation Utility (FVU) version 2.146 (to validate statement(s) pertaining to FY 2007-08 to 2009-10) and FVU version 5.0 (to validate statement(s) pertaining to FY 2010-11 onwards) 

Key Features – File Validation Utility (FVU) version 2.146

Incorporation of TAN and TAN name in the Challan Status Inquiry (i.e. .CSI) file and verification with the TDS/TCS statement during the time of validation through the FVU.

o TAN: In case, the TAN of the Deductor/Collector as per .CSI file does not match with the TAN as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will reject the TDS/TCS file and appropriate error message (Mismatch in present in the statement and .CSI file imported, kindly provide valid TAN) will be displayed to the user on validating the file through FVU.

o TAN Name: In case, the TAN Name (i.e. Name of Deductor/Collector) as per .CSI file does not match with the name as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will generate a displayed popup message as “Name of deductor in the statement should exactly match the Name of deductor as per TAN Master Database of ITD.”

Mandatory to mention Email IDs of deductor/collector and responsible person in TDS/TCS Statement.

o One of e-mail ids of Deductor/Collector or responsible person is required to be provided in the statement.

Change of State name from “ORISSA” to “ODISHA”.

This version of FVU is applicable with effect from April 13, 2016.

Download e-TDS/TCS FVU.exe (Version 2.146) Click Here >>

Key Features – File Validation Utility (FVU) version 5.0

Remark ‘B’ is made applicable for Section code 192A (Payment of accumulated balance due to an employee) for Form 26Q.

New Section code 194IA (Payment on transfer of certain immovable property other than agricultural land) has been added under list of sections available under Form 26Q.

Incorporation of TAN and TAN name in the Challan Status Inquiry (i.e. .CSI) file and verification with the TDS/TCS statement during the time of validation through the FVU.

o TAN: In case, the TAN of the Deductor/Collector as per .CSI file does not match with the TAN as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will reject the TDS/TCS file and appropriate error message (Mismatch in present in the statement and .CSI file imported, kindly provide valid TAN) will be displayed to the user on validating the file through FVU.

o TAN Name: In case, the TAN Name (i.e. Name of Deductor/Collector) as per .CSI file does not match with the name as per the TDS/TCS statement, FVU will generate a displayed popup message as “Name of deductor in the statement should exactly match the Name of deductor as per TAN Master Database of ITD.”

Mandatory to mention Email ID and mobile number of deductor/collector and responsible person in TDS/TCS Statement.

o One of e-mail ids of Deductor/Collector or responsible person is required to be provided in the statement.

o The value in the field ‘Mobile Number of responsible person’ is mandatory.

Change of State name from “ORISSA” to “ODISHA”.

This version of FVU is applicable with effect from April 13, 2016.

Download e-TDS/TCS FVU.exe (Version 5.0) Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago