Income Tax

Exemption to Mysore Palace Board, Karnataka u/s 10(46) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Exemption to Mysore Palace Board, Karnataka u/s 10(46) of Income Tax Act, 1961

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 33 /2019

New Delhi, the 9th April, 2019

S.O. 1537(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies for the purposes of the said clause, ‘Mysore Palace Board’, Karnataka, a board constituted by the Government of Karnataka, in respect of the following specified income arising to that board, namely:-

(a) Income from Palace or proceeds of any property vested in the Board;

(b) All fees and charges levied by the Board under the Mysore Palace (Acquisition and Transfer) Act, 1998 and forming part of the Board fund;

(c) Rent received from the stalls let out to Government Agencies; and

(d) Interest earned on (a) to (c) above.

2. This notification shall be effective subject to the conditions that Mysore Palace Board, Karnataka,-

(a) shall not engage in any commercial activity;

(b) activities and the nature of the specified income shall remain unchanged throughout the financial years; and

(c) shall file return of income in accordance with the provision of clause (g) of sub-section (4C) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

3. This notification shall apply with respect to the assessment years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 and 2023-2024.

[F.No.300196/63/2018-ITA-I]

RAJARAJESWARI R., Under Secy.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

23 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law – High Court

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE once assessee waived option

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is a findings of fact – High Court

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment,…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest earned on borrowed funds/unutilized capital subsidy is capital receipts – High Court

Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Guwahati High Court has…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

No statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act – HC

There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act - High Court stayed demand  …

3 days ago