Income Tax

Exemption to Mysore Palace Board, Karnataka u/s 10(46) of Income Tax Act, 1961

Exemption to Mysore Palace Board, Karnataka u/s 10(46) of Income Tax Act, 1961

MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)

Notification No. 33 /2019

New Delhi, the 9th April, 2019

S.O. 1537(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (46) of section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies for the purposes of the said clause, ‘Mysore Palace Board’, Karnataka, a board constituted by the Government of Karnataka, in respect of the following specified income arising to that board, namely:-

(a) Income from Palace or proceeds of any property vested in the Board;

(b) All fees and charges levied by the Board under the Mysore Palace (Acquisition and Transfer) Act, 1998 and forming part of the Board fund;

(c) Rent received from the stalls let out to Government Agencies; and

(d) Interest earned on (a) to (c) above.

2. This notification shall be effective subject to the conditions that Mysore Palace Board, Karnataka,-

(a) shall not engage in any commercial activity;

(b) activities and the nature of the specified income shall remain unchanged throughout the financial years; and

(c) shall file return of income in accordance with the provision of clause (g) of sub-section (4C) of section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

3. This notification shall apply with respect to the assessment years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, 2021-2022, 2022-2023 and 2023-2024.

[F.No.300196/63/2018-ITA-I]

RAJARAJESWARI R., Under Secy.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Information in loose papers not corroborated with assessee, can’t be said to belong to assessee

When information contained in loose papers not corroborated with assessee, there is absolutely no room for presumption that it belongs…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Setting aside remand order of CIT(A) without interfering with direction to delete addition, did not revive AO’s order

When CIT(A) order to remand case to AO was set aside without interfering with direction to delete addition, order of…

2 days ago
  • arbitration

Whether Arbitral Tribunal can grant a prohibited claim in a contract – Larger Bench to decide

Whether a prohibited claim in a contract applies only to the employer and not to the Arbitral Tribunal – Matter…

3 days ago
  • contract-law

Court can examine contractual employee termination on sole ground of ineligibility

Where a contractual employee is terminated on the sole ground of ineligibility, the Court is entitled to examine its correctness…

3 days ago
  • EPFO

Upon deceased acquiring family, as specified earlier GPF nomination became invalid – SC

Upon deceased acquiring family, GPF nomination in favour of mother became invalid and in absence of fresh nomination, mother and…

3 days ago
  • GST

Auto Suspension of GST Registration due to Non-Furnishing of Bank Account Details

GSTN Advisory on Auto Suspension of GST Registration due to Non-Furnishing of Bank Account Details as per Rule 10A As…

3 days ago