Income Tax

Determination of fair market value of unquoted equity shares of Start Up companies u/s 56(2)(viib)-CBDT Instruction

Determination of fair market value of unquoted equity shares of ‘Start Up’ companies under section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act read with Rule 11UA(2) of Income-tax Rules-CBDT Instruction

Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) provides that where a closely held company issues its shares at a price which is more than its fair market value, the amount received in excess of fair market value will be charged to tax in the hands of the company as income from other sources.

Explanation to section 56(2)(viib) of the Act prescribes various methods for valuation of fair market value of shares of the closely held company. Among the various options for valuation of fair market value, one of the methods prescribed is based on fair market value of the unquoted equity shares as determined by a merchant banker or an accountant as per the Discounted Free Cash Flow Method.

Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has issued an instruction to all the Pr CITs on the issue of Assessing Officers invoking section 56(2)(viib) in case of ‘Start Up’ companies which has otherwise raised a genuine investment on the basis of their ‘idea’.

According to the CBDT, as per the information received, during the assessments, ‘Start Up’ companies submit a valuation report from a merchant banker or an accountant based on Discounted Free Cash Flow Method as prescribed in Rule 11UA(2)(b) of Income-tax Rules, However, in such reports are not being accepted and rejected/modified by the Assessing Officers by treating them as based upon abnormal valuations resulting in additions being made u/s 56(2)(viib) of the Act in cases of ‘Start Up’ companies.

CBDT has instructed that in case of ‘Start Up’ companies which fall within the definition given in Notification of DIPP, of Commerce & Industry, in G.S.R. SOl(E) dated 23.05.2017, if additions have been made by the Assessing Officer under section 56(2)(viib) of the Act after modifying/rejecting the valuation so furnished under Rule 11UA(2), no coercive measure to recover the outstanding demand would be taken.

Further, it has been also instructed that all such cases, pending with the Commissioner (Appeals), necessary administrative steps should be taken for expeditious disposal of appeals, preferably by 31st March, 2018.

Download CBDT Instruction Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Once ITR is filled in response to notice u/s 148 though late, notice u/s 143(2) is must – ITAT

Once assessee filed ITR, in response to the notice u/s 148 of the Act, even beyond time prescribed, Assessing Officer…

2 days ago
  • tender

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for giving EMD by way of FD not DD

Petitioner was not disqualified in tender for submitting EMD by way of Fixed Deposit in place of Demand Draft -…

2 days ago
  • Bank

State Bank of India elects four Directors in its Central Board

State Bank of India in its General Meeting of the Shareholders elected four Directors to the Central Board. The meeting…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Declaration of additional income by increasing the WIP was not proper – ITAT

Voluntary declaration of additional income by increasing WIP was not proper, as assessee will take the additional benefit in the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash payment for purchase of land or property not violation of 269SS or 269T

Cash payment for purchase of land or property cannot be treated as violation of provisions of section 269SS or 269T…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Excel Utility for ITR-1 and ITR-4 available for e-filing for AY 2026-27

Income Tax Department has released excel Utility for e-filing ITR-1 and ITR-4 for AY 2026-27 Excel utilities of ITR-1 and…

6 days ago