Income Tax

Formula for computing Tax Effect where income computed u/s 115JB or 115JC . CBDT modifies circular 21/2015

Formula for computing Tax Effect where income computed u/s 115JB or 115JC . CBDT has modified the circular no. 21/2015 related to computation of tax effect for appeal purpose.

F.No.279/Misc-142/2007-ITJ-(Pt) 
Government  of India
Ministry  of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
*****

New Delhi, the 15th July, 2017

To,

All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax

Sub: Modification of Circular No. 21/2015 dated 10.12.2015

Madam/Sir,

References are being received by the Board that in certain cases appellate authorities are dismissing appeals without going into the merits of the case by relying on the definition of ‘tax effect’ as defined in Circular No. 21/2015, which prescribes the monetary limit for filing appeals before various appellate authorities. In certain situations where income is computed under the provisions of section 115JB or section 115JC for the purposes of determination of ‘tax effect’, and the additions made under provisions other than sections 115JB or section 115JC do not impact book profit, the appellate authorities  are  not considering the said additions for the purpose of ‘tax effect’ as defined in para 4 Circular No. 21/2015. The matter has been examined by the Board and the following para may be read as para 4.1 after the para 4 of the Circular No. 21/2015.

“4.1 Where income is computed under the provisions  of section 115JB or section 115JC for the purposes of determination of  ‘tax effect’, tax on the total income assessed shall be computed as per the following formula-

(A-B) +(C-D)

where,

A = the total income assessed as per the provisions other than the provisions contained in section 115JB or section 115JC (herein called general provisions);

B = the total income that would have been chargeable had the total income assessed as per the general provisions been reduced by the amount of the disputed issues under general provisions;

C =  the  total  income  assessed  as  per  the  provisions  contained   in section 115JB or section  115JC;

D = the total income that would have been chargeable had the total income assessed as per the provisions contained in section 115JB or section  115JC been reduced by the amount of disputed issues under the said provisions:

However, where the amount of disputed issues is considered both under the provisions contained in section 115JB or section 115JC and under general provisions, such amount shall not be reduced from total income assessed while determining  the  amount  under item  D.”

2. The Same may brought to the knowledge of all officers working under your charge.

3. This issues with the approval of the Board.

Yours faithfully,

(D.S. Rathi)
DCIT (OSD)(ITJ)
Tele: 011-26882637

Copy to:

  1. The Chairman, Members and all other officers in CBDT of the rank of Under Secretary and above
  2. All Chief Commissioners oflncome Tax and All Directors General of Income Tax with a request to bring to the attention of all officers .
  3. ADG (PR, PP & OL), Mayur Bhawan, New Delhi for printing in the quarterly Tax Bulletin and for circulation as per usual mailing list
  4. The Comptroller and Audit General of India
  5. ADGJ (Vigilance), Mayur Bhawan, New Delhi
  6. The Joint Secretary & Legal Advisor, Ministry of Law & Justice, New Delhi
  7. All Directorates oflncome-tax,  New Delhi and DGIT(NADT), Nagpur
  8. ITCC (3 Copies).
  9. The ADG(Systems)-4, for uploading on the Department’s website
  10. Data Base Cell for uploading on irsofficersonline.gov.in
  11. Hindi Cell for translation
  12. Guard File
----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

3 days ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

3 days ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

3 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

4 days ago