Govt. designates three Special Courts in Maharashtra for trial of offences punishable under the Income-tax Act, 1961
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
(Department of Revenue)
(CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES)
(INVESTIGATION DIVISION-V)
New Delhi, the 10th August, 2020
S.O.2682(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 280A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961) and section 84 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (22 of 2015), the Central Government, in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court of Bombay, hereby designates the following courts of Magistrates of First Class as Special Courts under sub-section (1) of section 280A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and section 84 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 in the State of Maharashtra, for trial of offences punishable under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and other related matters, namely:-
(i) the 38th Court, Ballard Pier for Mumbai region and 31st Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vikhroli for Mumbai including cases at Thane;
(ii) the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur for entire Vidarbha region, and
(iii) the Court of 10th Joint Civil Judge Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class (Court No.8), Pune for Pune region.
[F. No 285/30/2019-IT (Inv.V) CBDT]
DEEPAK TIWARI,
Commissioner of Income Tax (OSD) (INV.)
Objection of CIT(E) for loans taken without prior permission from Charity Commission was no reason for denial of registration u/s…
There is no prohibition to entertain a complaint at the instance of spouse of a CA for the reason that…
PCIT cannot invoke the revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act upon a proposal from the Assessing Officer…
If AO intends to disturb income returned by assessee, it is mandatory on his part to issue notice under section…
Source of cash deposit being sales proceeds of household items upon sale of flat was held plausible and addition u/s…
TDS deductibility being debatable issue and not an apparent incorrect claim, CPC was not justified in making the disallowance In…