Income and deductions claimed in ITR should also match with form 16 issued by the employer or Form 16A. issued by deductor, apart from TDS amount
Hitherto, normally while processing income tax return of an assessee under summary assessment u/s 143(1)(a), the focus of the Income Tax Department was on matching the amount of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS ) with the claim of TDS as per TDS credit as appearing in Online Form 26AS.
The assessee, particulalry the salaried one, too would ensure that his/her TDS is correctly reflected in the Form 26AS.
However, as per the advisory flashed by the Income Tax Department (ITD), the tax payers who are in the process of filing income tax returns for the Assessment Year 2017-18 (Financial Year 2016-17 ) have been cautioned.
As per the advisory the ITD has asked all the assessees should also ensure that the details of the amount of salary, and various deductions claimed in the return of income matches with the corrosponding firgures as per the Form 16 issued by the employer.
Similarly, the amount of income as per the return should match with that of as per form 16A issued by the deductor.
As per ITD , in case of mismatch/difference in the above figures (which is in addition to TDS mismatch), shall result in delay in processing of the return of income and refund claim / tax demand.
It is a normal practice that often an employee would not submit details all deductions to the employer but would claim them at the time of filing the ITR.
However, in view of the above advisory, tax payers, particularly salaried one should ensure that in case of such differences they keep proper records/proof for the excess deductions claimed or less income declared in contrast to Form 16
If an assessee receives notice from CPC asking explanation for the such difference, response can be submitted under e-Proceedings section in efiling website of the Income Tax.
Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…
Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…
When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…
ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…
Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…
Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…