Income Tax

Income offered before the Settlement Commission, cannot be taxed again u/s 143(3) – ITAT

Income offered and taxed in the proceedings before the Settlement Commission, cannot be taxed again in the proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Act

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2944 (2019) (05) ITAT

The asssessee had challenged the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in confirming the action of the Assessing Officer (AO) by sustaining the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on account of share application money received.

It was submitted that the assessee had moved an application before the Settlement Commission and the aforesaid addition presently in contest was already offered before the Settlement Commissions as included by way of additional income as reflected in the order of the Settlement Commission under ection. 245D(4) of the Act.

The assessee accordingly submitted that the income having already been offered before the Settlement Commission cannot once again be added in the regular assessment which will amount to double taxation.

The Tribunal expressed agreement with the contention of the assessee on principle that the same income if offered and taxed in the proceedings before the Settlement Commission, cannot be included once again in the present proceeding under section 143(3) of the Act.

Accordingly, the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the file of the AO for factual verification on this aspect.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

5 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

8 hours ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT ought to remanded whole matter of bogus purchases instead of profit determination

ITAT on presumption of bogus purchases ought to have remanded case to AO to reconsider the whole matter instead of…

9 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Where proceedings u/s 153C barred by limitation, AO can’t invoke section 148 & 148A

Where proceedings u/s 153C are barred by limitation, AO can not reopen the case invoking section 148 and 148A of…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

Corporate guarantees executed by corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC

Corporate guarantees executed by the corporate debtor constitute “financial debt” under IBC and banks to be recognized as financial creditors…

1 day ago