Income Tax

Increased PAN applications due to demonetisation and amendments in Rule 114B and Rule 114E. Timely resolution of probable duplicate PAN

Increased PAN applications due to demonetisation and amendments in Rule 114B and Rule 114E. Timely resolution of probable duplicate PAN marked by system

Income Tax is gearing up of the PAN services due to sharp increase in PAN Applications after the recall of high denomination bank notes and and requirements for quoting of PAN in recent amendments in Rule 114B and Rule 114E

The Income Tax Directorate of Systems has issued directions (ITBA-PAN Instruction No. 7) to all the authorities in this regard.

As per the Instruction, as per the procedure in place a reasonable number of PAN allotment requests are marked as probable duplicate by the system which has to be resolved by respective Regional Computer Centres whereby PAN details are matched to either allot a new PAN or mark the request as duplicate.

The Directorate has urged such Centres that all out efforts should be made to resolve all duplicate PAN requests marked during allotment process to ensure lowest pendency on this account.

The Directorate has also urged for deputing additional man powers on immediate basis wherever any such shortage is reported.

The Directorate has advised Centres to contact helpdesk in case of any issue or clarification in respect of PAN module.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme

ITAT allows exemption u/s 54 allowed despite failure to deposit the amount in Capital Gains Accounts Scheme and new asset…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition to be made in hands of assessee solely on basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet

Addition cannot be made in the hands of the assessee solely on the basis of uncorroborated loose-sheet - ITAT In…

16 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) dismissed beyond Rs. 3 lakhs

ITAT dismisses claim of Leave Encashment exemption u/s 10(10AA)(ii) beyond Rs. 3 lakhs In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has…

22 hours ago
  • Income Tax

AO took a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat was 25 lakh – ITAT

Assessing Officer had taken a reasonable stand that 25 kg written in WhatsApp chat/text message was 25 lakh - ITAT…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Shareholders can’t be taxed for income from properties owned by the company – HC

Shareholders are only owners of the shares of the company therefore, income from properties earned by the company cannot be…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Jurisdictional error in reassessment approval can’t be shielded by the law of limitation

When approval for reassessment was granted by unauthorised authority, such jurisdictional error cannot be shielded by the law of limitation…

2 days ago