Income Tax

Indirect Transfer Provisions Circular 41/2016 kept in abeyance due to the issue of possible multiple taxation of the same income.

Indirect Transfer Provisions Circular 41/2016 kept in abeyance due to the issue of possible multiple taxation of the same income.

Circular No. 4 of 2017

F.No 500/43/2012-FT&TRJV
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(FT&TR- Division)

New Delhi, 20th January, 2017.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes had issued Circular No. 41/2016 on 21st December,2016 regarding Indirect Transfer Provisions under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

2. After the issue of circular No. 41/2016, representations have been received from various FPIs, Flls, VCFs and other stakeholders. The stakeholders have presented their concerns stating that the circular does not address the issue of possible multiple taxation of the same income.  The representations made by the stakeholders are currently under consideration and examination.

3. Pending a decision in the matter, operation of Circular No. 41 of 2016 dated 21st December, 2016 is kept in abeyance for the time being.

Dr. O. No. Supriya Rao
Under Secretary [FT&TR-V-(2)]

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 can not be a non-existing or incorrect information

The prima facie satisfaction u/s 148 cannot be stretched to a non-existing information or incorrect information - ITAT In a…

20 hours ago
  • SEBI

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices

Mutual Funds to value physical Gold and Silver by using the polled spot prices published by the recognized stock exchanges…

1 day ago
  • bankruptcy

SC allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor & corporate guarantor

Supreme Court allows simultaneous CIRP proceedings against principal debtor and its corporate guarantor, declines to frame any guidelines In a…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Merely because sales were declared for only one month, same cannot be treated as bogus

Merely because assessee had declared sales for only one month, the same cannot be treated as bogus on the basis…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT deleted addition as method of accounting had been accepted in earlier years

ITAT deleted addition as the method of accounting had been accepted by the department in earlier years and the entire…

3 days ago
  • Benami

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under IBC 2016 – SC

Orders passed under Benami Act cannot be challenged under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - SC In a recent judgment,…

4 days ago