Income Tax

Intimation issued u/s 143(1) after issue of notice u/s 143(2) is legally invalid

Intimation issued u/s 143(1) after issue of notice u/s 143(2) legally invalid. Intimation u/s 143(1)(a) can not be issued after notice for regular assessment has been issued under section 143(2)

ITAT in a recent judgment has confirmed that Intimation issued u/s 143(1) after issue of notice u/s 143(2) legally invalid

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3772 (2023) (06) ITAT

In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming the adjustment made by the intimation issued under section 143(1)(a) after the notice for regular assessment has been issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).

Undisputed fact was that notice u/s 143(2) was issued one month prior to the intimation u/s 143(1) was issued to the assessee.

The Tribunal observed that the Hon’ble Supreme Court had occasion to examine the question as to whether it is open to the Revenue to issue intimation under section 143(1)(a) of the Act after a notice for regular assessment as been issued under section 143(2) of the Act?

The Hon’ble Supreme Court was listening to the challenge made by the Revenue to the order of the Hon’ble High Court in holding that no substantial question of law arise for consideration.

The case of the respondents was that there is a limitation on the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to commence proceedings under section 143(1)(a) of the Act.

The Tribunal noted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court held that there is no dispute that Section 143(1)(a) of the Act enacts a summary procedure for quick collection of tax and quick refunds. Under the scheme if there is a serious objection to any of the orders made by the Assessing Officer determining the income it is open to the assessee to ask for rectification under section 154. Apart therefrom, the provisions of section 143(1)(a)(i) indicates that the intimation sent under section 143(1)(a) shall be without prejudice to the provisions of sub section (2). The legislature, therefore intended that, where the summary procedure under Sub-section (1) has been adopted, there should be scope available for the Revenue, either suo moto or at the instance of the assessee to make a regular assessment under sun-section (2) of section 143. The converse is not available; a regular assessment proceedings have been commenced under section 143(2), there is no need for a summary proceeding under section 143(1)(a).

The Tribunal, placing reliance on the order of the Apex Court held that the action of the revenue cannot be supported and the intimation issued u/s 143(1) after the issue of notice u/s 143(2) was legally invalid.

Accordingly, the appeal was allowed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Non-deduction of TDS does not make transaction as unexplained in the hands of deductee – ITAT

Mere non-deduction of TDS by the deductor on a transaction does not change the character of the transaction to make…

2 days ago
  • ICAI

Last date to submit MEF 2026-27 extended to 09.09.2026

ICAI has extended the last date to online submit Multipurpose Empanelment Form (MEF)- 2026-27 from 29th August 2026 to 9th…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

6 days ago