IRS Officer along with mother sent to Rigorous Imprisonment in a disproportionate assests case by the CBI Court
The Special Judge, CBI Cases, Dehradun (Uttarakhand) has sentenced Shri Swetabh Suman (an IRS Officer of 1988 Batch), the then Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamshedpur to undergo seven years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs.3.5 crore; his mother Smt. Gulab Devi to undergo one year Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs.10,000/- and two other persons, namely Arun Kumar Singh & Rajinder Vikram Singh, both to undergo four years Rigorous Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 20,000/-each in a disproportionate assests case. The Court has also ordered the confiscation of the properties of the accused Swetabh Suman including the house at Dehradun, 01 plot at Noida, the Hotel at Bodh Gaya (Bihar) and a Honda City Car.
CBI had registered a case on 02.08.2005 against Shri Swetabh Suman u/s 13(2) r/w 13(1) (e) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for being in alleged possession of huge assets disproportionate to his known sources of income, during the period from April, 1997 to March, 2004.
Investigation established that the accused abused his official position as a public servant to acquire immovable / movable assets from his ill-gotten money amounting to Rs. 3,13,90,408/- (approx) in his name and in the name of the co-accused persons. After completion of investigation, a Chargesheet was filed against the accused Swetabh Suman, his mother Smt. Gulab Devi, Arun Kumar Singh (his brother-in-law) and Rajinder Vikram Singh on 26.07.2010 in the Court of Special Judge, CBI Cases, Dehradun (Uttarakhand).
The Trial Court found the accused guilty and convicted them. During the course of the trial, some prosecution witnesses who were public servants had turned hostile. The Court has ordered initiation of appropriate departmental action against the said public servants.
Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…
Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…
Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…