Income Tax

ITAT directed AO to give telescopic benefit for chit contributions – ITAT

ITAT directed AO to give telescopic benefit for chit contributions as there was no finding that income estimated from business was invested else where

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2995 (2019) (06) ITAT

The only grounds of appeal raised by the assessee in the instant appeal was related to the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 56 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on account of chit contributions made by the assessee.

The assessee was engaged in the business of Indian made Foreign Liquor (IMFL). His assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act by estimated the income @5% on net purchases put to sale and also an addition was made as income from other sources u/s 56 of the Act towards the contribution to chits, since there was no source for the chit contribution from certain period and the AO treated those contributions as unexplained.

Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee went on appeal before the CIT(A) and requested for telescopic benefit of chit contributions made out of the estimated income.

Not being convinced, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee and confirmed the addition made by the AO.

The Tribunal observed that the AO rejected the books of accounts and estimated the income @5%. Though the AO had estimated the income, there was no finding given by the AO or CIT(A) that the income on estimation was invested in any other modes.

The Tribunal opined that since there was no finding given by the AO that the resulted income out of the estimation was invested in unexplained investments, it was presumed that the resultant income out of the estimation is available to the assessee for investments/drawings.

The Tribunal opined that the assessee’s request for telescopic benefit of chit installments required to be considered favourably, after providing for the personal drawings and expenditure.

Accordingly the Tribunal directed the AO  to give telescopic benefit of 50% of the chit contribution out of the estimated income.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • arbitration

Whether condition of pre-deposit prior to reference to Arbitration is arbitrary & violative of right to sue?

Whether condition of pre-deposit prior to reference to Arbitration is arbitrary and violative of the right to sue – Division…

2 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers Disclosure Scheme and Rule 2026

Frequently asked Questions on Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers Disclosure Scheme and Rule 2026.  CBDT has released a FAQs on…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers- Disclosure Scheme Rules 2026 notified

Foreign Assets of Small Taxpayers- Disclosure Scheme Rules 2026 notified. Rule come into force on the 16th day of August,…

3 days ago
  • GST

Order u/s 69 of the CGST Act has to be communicated before arrest of person concerned– SC

Order u/s 69 of the CGST Act authorising arrest of a person has to be communicated to him before arrest–…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Refund can not be denied on the ground that it was claimed in a return filed u/s 148 – ITAT

Refund can not be denied on the ground that it was claimed in a return filed u/s 148 where no…

6 days ago
  • Income Tax

Distinction between religious & charitable purposes is determined by institution’s primary or dominant object

The distinction between religious and charitable purposes is determined by institution's primary or dominant object and not merely by presence…

7 days ago