Exclusive Jurisdiction of one CIT-A overs cases assessed under the Black Money Act 2015. Nineteen such stations notified by CBDT
The Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (BM Act) has been enacted to deal with the problem of Black money in the form of undisclosed foreign income and assets, and to provide for imposition of tax on such undisclosed foreign income and asset held outside India and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
As per section 15 of the BM Act, any person aggrieved with the order passed by the Assessing Officer under the BM Act, may file an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals). However, Commissioner (Appeals) under the BM Act have not yet been notified and the jurisdiction has also not been assigned to such Commissioner (Appeals).
In view of the above, it has been decided by the Central Board Direct Taxes (the Board) that one of the Commissioner (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act, 1961 in each Pr. CCIT Region may be given jurisdiction over the cases assessed under the BM Act.
Further, it is proposed that such Commissioner (Appeals) under the Income-tax Act, 1961 to be notified under the BM Act, 2015 may be stationed, as per the table below: –
S. No. | Pr. CCIT Region | Station of the CIT(A) to be notified as Commissioner (Appeals) under the BM Act, 2015 |
1. | Delhi | Delhi |
2. | Mumbai | Mumbai |
3. | NWR | Chandigrah |
4. | Rajasthan | Jaipur |
5. | UP East | Lucknow |
6. | UP West and Uttarakhand | Kanpur |
7. | Madhya Pradesh and Chattisgarh | Bhopal |
8. | Bihar and Jharkhand | Patna |
9. | West Bengal and Kolkata | Sikkim |
10. | North Eastern Region | Guwahati |
11. | Odisha | Bhubaneswar |
12. | Andhra Pradesh and Telangana | Hyderabad |
13. | Tamilnadu and Puducherry | Chennai |
14. | Kerala | Kochi |
15. | Karnataka and Goa | Bengaluru |
16. | Pune | Pune |
17. | Nagpur | Nagpur |
18. | Gujarat | Ahmedabad |
19. | International Taxation | Delhi |
Download Notification Click Here >>
----------- Similar Posts: -----------Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…
Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…
Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…
Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…
Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…
ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee In a recent…