Income Tax

Exclusive Jurisdiction of one CIT-A overs cases assessed under the Black Money Act 2015.

Exclusive Jurisdiction of one CIT-A overs cases assessed under the Black Money Act 2015. Nineteen such stations notified by CBDT 

The Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 (BM Act) has been  enacted  to deal with the problem of Black money in the form of undisclosed foreign income and assets, and to provide for imposition of tax on such  undisclosed foreign income and asset held outside India and for matters connected therewith  or incidental thereto.

As per section 15 of the BM Act, any person aggrieved with the order passed by the Assessing Officer under the BM Act, may file an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals). However, Commissioner (Appeals) under the BM Act have not yet been notified and the jurisdiction has also not been assigned to such Commissioner (Appeals).

Exclusive jurisdiction to one Commissioner (Appeals) over cases assessed under the BM Act

In view of the above, it has been decided by the Central Board Direct Taxes (the Board) that one of the Commissioner (Appeals) under the Income Tax Act, 1961 in each  Pr. CCIT Region may be given jurisdiction over the cases assessed under the BM Act.

Further, it is proposed that such Commissioner (Appeals) under the Income-tax Act, 1961 to be notified under the BM Act, 2015 may be stationed, as per the table below: –

S. No. Pr. CCIT Region Station of the CIT(A) to be notified as Commissioner (Appeals) under the BM Act,  2015
1. Delhi Delhi
2. Mumbai Mumbai
3. NWR Chandigrah
4. Rajasthan Jaipur
5. UP East Lucknow
6. UP West and Uttarakhand Kanpur
7. Madhya Pradesh and  Chattisgarh Bhopal
8. Bihar and Jharkhand Patna
9. West Bengal and Kolkata Sikkim
10. North Eastern Region Guwahati
11. Odisha Bhubaneswar
12. Andhra Pradesh  and Telangana Hyderabad
13. Tamilnadu and Puducherry Chennai
14. Kerala Kochi
15. Karnataka and Goa Bengaluru
16. Pune Pune
17. Nagpur Nagpur
18. Gujarat Ahmedabad
19. International Taxation Delhi

 Download Notification Click Here >>

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

16 hours ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

19 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

2 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV

Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of current FMV to be further…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

AO was directed to serve notice of hearing through physical mode upon assessee 

ITAT directed AO to serve notice of hearing both through electronic and physical mode upon the assessee  In a recent…

2 days ago