Income Tax

Limitation for penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961-CBDT Circular 10/2016

 

Circular No. 10/2016

F.No.279/Misc./M-140/2015-ITJ
Government of India

Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
******

New Delhi, 26th April , 2016

Subject:- Limitation for penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961 – reg.

The issue whether the limitation for imposition of penalty under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is determined under section 275(1)(a) or section 275(1)(c) of the Act, has given rise to considerable litigation.

2. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Worldwide Township Projects Ltd., vide its order dated 21.5.14 in ITA No. 232/2014 , considered  the issue and observed that , It is well settled that a penalty under this provision is independent of the assessment. The action inviting imposition of penalty is granting of loans above the prescribed  limit otherwise than through banking channels and as such infringement of Section 269SS of the Act  is not related to the income that may be assessed or finally adjudicated.  In this view Section 2 75(1)(a) of the Act would not be applicable and the provisions of Section 275(1)(c) would be attracted. The judgment has been accepted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

3. In view of the above, it is a settled position that the period of limitation of penalty proceedings under section 271D and 271E of the Act is governed by the provisions of section 275(1)(c) of the Therefore , the limitation period for the imposition of penalty under these provisions would be the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings , in the course of which action for the imposition of penalty has been initiated , are completed , or six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated , whichever period expires later. The limitation period is not dependent on the pendency of appeal against the assessment or other order referred to in section 275(1)(a) of the Act.

4. Accordingly , no appeals may henceforth be filed on this ground by the officers of the Department and appeals already filed , if any, on this issue before various Courts/ Tribunals may not be pressed upon.

5. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

(Sadhana Panwar)
DCIT ( SD)(ITJ),
CBDT, New Delhi.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • ICSI

Engagement of Company Secretaries as Young Professionals at RoC Mumbai and Pune

Engagement of Company Secretaries (CS) as Young Professionals in the Office of Regional Director (WR), Registrar of Companies, Mumbai and…

3 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Applicability of Section 115BBE rws 69, 69A 69C in a case before Settlement Commission

Applicability of provisions of Section 115BBE  read with Section 69, 69A and 69C in a case arising before Settlement Commission…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits

Addition u/s 68 for jewellery purportedly received on death of grandparent under Will upheld. In a recent judgment, ITAT upheld…

2 days ago
  • bankruptcy

SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC

Supreme Court lays down tests to determine whether a debt is a financial debt or an operational debt under IBC…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus

Merely because directors of two companies were common not mean that deposits received was bogus and companies were shell companies…

3 days ago
  • ITAT

Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC

Application though named as rectification but if tax imposed is not legitimate then it also touches upon the merit –…

3 days ago