Income Tax

Limitation for penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961-CBDT Circular 10/2016

 

Circular No. 10/2016

F.No.279/Misc./M-140/2015-ITJ
Government of India

Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
******

New Delhi, 26th April , 2016

Subject:- Limitation for penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961 – reg.

The issue whether the limitation for imposition of penalty under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is determined under section 275(1)(a) or section 275(1)(c) of the Act, has given rise to considerable litigation.

2. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Worldwide Township Projects Ltd., vide its order dated 21.5.14 in ITA No. 232/2014 , considered  the issue and observed that , It is well settled that a penalty under this provision is independent of the assessment. The action inviting imposition of penalty is granting of loans above the prescribed  limit otherwise than through banking channels and as such infringement of Section 269SS of the Act  is not related to the income that may be assessed or finally adjudicated.  In this view Section 2 75(1)(a) of the Act would not be applicable and the provisions of Section 275(1)(c) would be attracted. The judgment has been accepted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

3. In view of the above, it is a settled position that the period of limitation of penalty proceedings under section 271D and 271E of the Act is governed by the provisions of section 275(1)(c) of the Therefore , the limitation period for the imposition of penalty under these provisions would be the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings , in the course of which action for the imposition of penalty has been initiated , are completed , or six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated , whichever period expires later. The limitation period is not dependent on the pendency of appeal against the assessment or other order referred to in section 275(1)(a) of the Act.

4. Accordingly , no appeals may henceforth be filed on this ground by the officers of the Department and appeals already filed , if any, on this issue before various Courts/ Tribunals may not be pressed upon.

5. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

(Sadhana Panwar)
DCIT ( SD)(ITJ),
CBDT, New Delhi.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Sundry creditors can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) because recovery barred by limitation

Sundry creditors outstanding in books can’t be treated income u/s 41(1) merely because recovery was barred by limitation - ITAT…

44 seconds ago
  • Income Tax

Exemption u/s 11 allowed for ITR filed u/s 139 not u/s 139(1) as per CBDT Circular

For claiming exemption u/s 11, assessee is required to furnish return of income within time allowed u/s 139 and not…

4 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of TCS u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed to rates of Tax Collection at Source u/s 394(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025  Income Tax…

6 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions u/s 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025

FAQs on amendment proposed in Updated return provisions under section 263(6) of Income Tax Act 2025 by Budget 2026-27 Income…

7 hours ago
  • Income Tax

FAQs on Amendments proposed in TDS and related provisions by Budget 2026-27

Income Tax Department has issued a FAQ on amendments proposed to provisions related to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) and…

9 hours ago
  • Custom

Baggage Rules 2026 rationalised, other newly introduced Custom reforms

Baggage Rules 2026 to rationalise existing rules to address genuine concerns faced by passengers at airports The earlier Baggage Rules,…

20 hours ago