Income Tax

Limitation for penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961-CBDT Circular 10/2016

 

Circular No. 10/2016

F.No.279/Misc./M-140/2015-ITJ
Government of India

Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
******

New Delhi, 26th April , 2016

Subject:- Limitation for penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961 – reg.

The issue whether the limitation for imposition of penalty under sections 271D and 271E of the Income tax Act, 1961, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is determined under section 275(1)(a) or section 275(1)(c) of the Act, has given rise to considerable litigation.

2. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Worldwide Township Projects Ltd., vide its order dated 21.5.14 in ITA No. 232/2014 , considered  the issue and observed that , It is well settled that a penalty under this provision is independent of the assessment. The action inviting imposition of penalty is granting of loans above the prescribed  limit otherwise than through banking channels and as such infringement of Section 269SS of the Act  is not related to the income that may be assessed or finally adjudicated.  In this view Section 2 75(1)(a) of the Act would not be applicable and the provisions of Section 275(1)(c) would be attracted. The judgment has been accepted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

3. In view of the above, it is a settled position that the period of limitation of penalty proceedings under section 271D and 271E of the Act is governed by the provisions of section 275(1)(c) of the Therefore , the limitation period for the imposition of penalty under these provisions would be the expiry of the financial year in which the proceedings , in the course of which action for the imposition of penalty has been initiated , are completed , or six months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated , whichever period expires later. The limitation period is not dependent on the pendency of appeal against the assessment or other order referred to in section 275(1)(a) of the Act.

4. Accordingly , no appeals may henceforth be filed on this ground by the officers of the Department and appeals already filed , if any, on this issue before various Courts/ Tribunals may not be pressed upon.

5. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned.

(Sadhana Panwar)
DCIT ( SD)(ITJ),
CBDT, New Delhi.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Date of digital signature and issue determines date of a notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act

Date of digital signature and issuance determines the date of a notice u/s148 of the Income Tax Act - ITAT…

2 days ago
  • DGFT

DGFT authorises IACCIA to issue Certificate of Origin (Non- Preferential)

DGFT authorises IACCIA to issue Certificate of Origin (Non- Preferential) w.e.f. 9th January 2026 In exercise of powers conferred under…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Net profit rate may not have variation commensurate to increase of turnover

Net profit rate may not per se experience variation commensurate to the increase of turnover. In a recent judgment, Allahabad…

2 days ago
  • Excise/Custom

Mushroom growing apparatus cannot be classified as ‘agricultural machinery’

Mushroom growing apparatus cannot be classified as ‘agricultural machinery’ under Customs Tariff Heading 8436. In a recent judgment, Hon'ble Supreme…

2 days ago
  • negotiable instrument act

Statutory presumption attached to issuance of a cheque to be accorded due weight – SC

Statutory presumption attached to issuance of a cheque, being one made in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability,…

3 days ago
  • tender

Highest bid can’t be discarded on mere expectation of even more higher bid

Merely because the authority conducting auction expects higher bid than the highest bidder is no reason to discard the highest…

3 days ago