Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 43B when unpaid custom duty included in closing stock – SLP dismissed by SC

No disallowance u/s 43B when unpaid custom duty was included in the value of the closing stock – Supreme Court dismissed SLP of the Department

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2776 (2019) (02) SC

The Assessing Officer (AO) had made a disallowance u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on the ground that the addition made represented the customs duty not actually paid during the relevant assessment year.

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer. Aggrieved by the same, the assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal a difference of opinion arose between the Judicial Member and the accountant member. The third member of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concurred with the decision of the Judicial Member and thereby the order of the Assessing Officer was set aside and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed as per the majority view.

The Tribunal held that the disallowance u/s 43B could not be made in respect of unpaid customs duty as it was included in the value of the closing stock.

The Tribunal held that once an amount was included in the closing stock, the same was to be considered as part of profit and cancelled out the expenditure claimed and therefore section 43B could not be applied on such expenditure.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that the Tribunal, placing reliance on the Profit and Loss Account of the assessee,  had recorded the finding that the assessee had included the total customs duty provision in the cost of raw material and also in the value of the closing stock. Thus, the customs duty got reflected on both the debit and credit side of the account and therefore it did not in any way reduced the profits since the assessee himself did not claim deduction of the customs duty liability from the taxable profits.

The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the appeal of the Revenue on the basis of the above finding of fact which was based on materials.

Aggrieved by the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court, the Revenue had filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court which has been dismissed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • GST

Extension of time limit for furnishing GSTR 3B under Delhi GST Act 2017

Extension of time limit for furnishing GSTR 3B under Delhi GST Act 2017 Department of Trade and Taxes(Policy and Research…

3 hours ago
  • ICAI

Audit Fee to be received only by digital modes/banking channels -ICAI revises Ethics

Acceptance of Audit Fee only through digital modes or banking channels from 01.04.2026 – ICAI revises Code of Ethics  In…

10 hours ago
  • Service Tax

Demand set aside as assessee for period covered had discharged tax liability under SVLDRS

High Court sets aside demand notices in respect of a period, for which the assessee had discharged tax liability under…

18 hours ago
  • Income Tax

No addition u/s 68 when there is no fresh receipt of unsecured loans during the year

Addition u/s 68 can not be made applicable where there is no fresh receipt of unsecured loans at all during…

21 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Taxes on sales comprising in turnover to be excluded for estimating net profit

Amount of taxes on sales comprising in turnover to be excluded while computing gross receipts for estimating net profit -…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Capital contribution deposited in assessee’s bank not partnership firm – Addition 69A upheld

Addition u/s 69A confirmed as alleged capital contribution by partners was deposited in bank account of assessee not in account…

2 days ago