Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 43B when unpaid custom duty included in closing stock – SLP dismissed by SC

No disallowance u/s 43B when unpaid custom duty was included in the value of the closing stock – Supreme Court dismissed SLP of the Department

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2776 (2019) (02) SC

The Assessing Officer (AO) had made a disallowance u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on the ground that the addition made represented the customs duty not actually paid during the relevant assessment year.

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer. Aggrieved by the same, the assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal a difference of opinion arose between the Judicial Member and the accountant member. The third member of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concurred with the decision of the Judicial Member and thereby the order of the Assessing Officer was set aside and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed as per the majority view.

The Tribunal held that the disallowance u/s 43B could not be made in respect of unpaid customs duty as it was included in the value of the closing stock.

The Tribunal held that once an amount was included in the closing stock, the same was to be considered as part of profit and cancelled out the expenditure claimed and therefore section 43B could not be applied on such expenditure.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that the Tribunal, placing reliance on the Profit and Loss Account of the assessee,  had recorded the finding that the assessee had included the total customs duty provision in the cost of raw material and also in the value of the closing stock. Thus, the customs duty got reflected on both the debit and credit side of the account and therefore it did not in any way reduced the profits since the assessee himself did not claim deduction of the customs duty liability from the taxable profits.

The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the appeal of the Revenue on the basis of the above finding of fact which was based on materials.

Aggrieved by the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court, the Revenue had filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court which has been dismissed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Assessee eligible for Chapter VIA deduction u/s 80IE on increased income due to disallownces

Assessee is eligible for claiming deduction under Chapter VIA under Section 80IE of the Income Tax Act 1961 on the…

10 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Assessee filing ITR under presumptive tax can’t be faulted for not giving details not mandated

Assessee could not be faulted for showing only cash in hand and bank balance as capital following presumptive taxation when…

15 hours ago
  • Income Tax

Sale of flats in a real estate project held capital gains considering intention of assessee

Sale of flats in a real estate project held capital gains as intention of the assesee was to hold that…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Interest liability recognised by journal entries at the close of year, can’t be termed as fictitious – ITAT

Merely because interest liability was recognised by journal entries at the close of the year, it does not make expenditure…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash deposits in bank which were immediately transferred to other accounts – addition deleted

Addition for cash deposits in bank account which were immediately transferred to other accounts deleted in absence any enquiry by…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

ITAT disallows 6% for alleged bogus purchases being appropriate

ITAT disallows 6% for alleged bogus purchases as purchases from unregistered dealers could not be ruled out. In a recent…

3 days ago