Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 43B when unpaid custom duty included in closing stock – SLP dismissed by SC

No disallowance u/s 43B when unpaid custom duty was included in the value of the closing stock – Supreme Court dismissed SLP of the Department

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2776 (2019) (02) SC

The Assessing Officer (AO) had made a disallowance u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on the ground that the addition made represented the customs duty not actually paid during the relevant assessment year.

Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer. Aggrieved by the same, the assessee filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal a difference of opinion arose between the Judicial Member and the accountant member. The third member of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal concurred with the decision of the Judicial Member and thereby the order of the Assessing Officer was set aside and the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed as per the majority view.

The Tribunal held that the disallowance u/s 43B could not be made in respect of unpaid customs duty as it was included in the value of the closing stock.

The Tribunal held that once an amount was included in the closing stock, the same was to be considered as part of profit and cancelled out the expenditure claimed and therefore section 43B could not be applied on such expenditure.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that the Tribunal, placing reliance on the Profit and Loss Account of the assessee,  had recorded the finding that the assessee had included the total customs duty provision in the cost of raw material and also in the value of the closing stock. Thus, the customs duty got reflected on both the debit and credit side of the account and therefore it did not in any way reduced the profits since the assessee himself did not claim deduction of the customs duty liability from the taxable profits.

The Hon’ble High Court dismissed the appeal of the Revenue on the basis of the above finding of fact which was based on materials.

Aggrieved by the judgment of the Hon’ble High Court, the Revenue had filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Hon’ble Supreme Court which has been dismissed.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

2 days ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

5 days ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

1 week ago
  • RTI

Lokayukta Police not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005 – SC

Lokayukta Police not an ‘intelligence and security’ organisation  and hence not exempt from disclosure of information under RTI Act 2005…

1 week ago