Income Tax

No disallowance merely because vouchers was fresh not faded or torn

No disallowance merely because vouchers was fresh not faded or torn. When self made vouchers not found false, no addition can be made on presumption

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 2717 (2019) (01) ITAT

This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) in sustaining the disallowance of business promotion expenses made by the Assessing Officer (AO).  

The AO had disallowed business promotion expenses on the ground that they were supported by self-vouchers, self made vouchers and some third party vouchers, which appeared to have been cooked up.

As per the Assessing Officer, the vouchers submitted appeared fresh, neither faded nor torn. Therefore the AO made the impugned disallowance.  

The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance as non-genuine business promotion expenses on the ground that there was no further supporting documents.

Before the Tribunal, the assessee submitted that all the evidences had been produced, which were in the form of vouchers, and none of the vouchers were found to be false and the disallowances had been made on presumptions.

The Tribunal observed that the disallowances was made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) was only on the basis of presumptions whereas an assessment order cannot be made on presumptions and assumptions.

The Tribunal noted that it was not the case that the assessee had not produced vouchers. The assessee had produced them and just because the Assessing Officer suspected the same, there could not be any disallowance.

Accordingly, the ITAT deleted the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A)

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

Validity of demand u/s 156 for default u/s 115-O, if assessment order u/s 143(3) has Nil demand

Can a demand notice be issued u/s 156 for non-payment of Dividend tax u/s 115-O, when as per assessment order…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Issue already examined and adjudicated by CIT(Appeals), can’t be reopened on same set of facts

The issue already examined and adjudicated by the quasi-judicial authority, i.e., CIT(Appeals), cannot be reopened on the same set of…

3 days ago
  • Income Tax

TDS can’t be denied for non deposit of tax deducted by the deductor – High Court

One TDS is deducted, credit has to follow, failure of deductor to deposit the amount to the credit of the…

4 days ago
  • Income Tax

Cash withdrawal from bank can’t be taxed u/s 69C as unexplained expenditure – ITAT

Merely because assessee did not explain purpose of cash withdrawal from bank, it can not be taxed u/s 69C as…

4 days ago
  • GST

A bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” in GST Notice u/s 74 not sufficient – SC

In GST Notice u/s 74, allegations should emanate from itself, a bland statement of ‘fraud or concealment of facts” not…

7 days ago
  • Income Tax

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii), test is of purpose and connection, not actual yield – ITAT

For claiming deduction u/s 57(iii) a reasonable and intelligible nexus should be established between the expenditure incurred and the income…

7 days ago