Income Tax

Non-acceptance of IDS-2016 challan ITNS-286 by banks stating that Scheme has closed. CBDT lodges grievance with RBI

Non-acceptance of IDS-2016 challan ITNS-286 by banks stating that Scheme has closed on 30.09.2016. CBDT lodges grievance of declarants with RBI.

F. No.142/8/2016- TPL (Part)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(TPL Division)
***

New Delhi, dated 10th November, 2016

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub:  Grievance  regarding  non-allowance  by  banks  to  make  payment under IDS, 2016 through ITNS-286

A representation has been received from a declarant under IDS, 2016 stating that the State Bank of India at Bengaluru has refused to accept payments through income-tax challan ITNS-286. It has been alleged that the bank authorities refused to accept payment stating that since IDS, 2016 has closed on 30.09.2016 the banks cannot accept the said challan beyond the said date.

2. In this context, your kind attention is invited to notification S.O. 2476(E) dated 20.07.2016 wherein the following time schedule has been prescribed for making payments under IDS, 2016:

(i) a minimum amount of 25% of the tax, surcharge and penalty to be paid by 30.11.2016;
(ii) a further amount of 25% of the tax, surcharge and penalty to be paid by 3.2017; and
(iii) the balance amount to be paid on or before 30.9.2017

3. In view of the above, I am directed to r quest you to kindly bring the above time schedule for making payments under IDS, 2016 to the notice of all the banks and issue directions to the banks to accept payments under IDS, 2016 upto 30.09.2017.

(Dr. T. S. Mapwal)
Under Secretary (TPL-IV)

Shri N.S. Vishwanathan
Deputy Governor
Reserve Bank of India
New Delhi

Authors Note:
In response to the above, Indian Banks Association vide its letter has requested all Banks to make note of the time schedule for payments of taxes under IDS-2016 and as directed accept payments under IDS, 2016 upto 30.09.2017 and also for such cases the banks should not seek source of funds.

----------- Similar Posts: -----------
Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default

In absence of mala fide intention bank should not be treated as assessee in default for late deduction and deposit…

1 day ago
  • Income Tax

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact

Whether bank account was fraudulently open in the name of assessee is question of fact. High Court declined to entertain…

1 day ago
  • Concurrent Audit

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms 2024-25. Last date 18.05.2024

SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of Chartered Accountant Firms for FY 2024-25 SBI Concurrent Auditor Empanelment of CA Firms for FY…

1 day ago
  • Companies Act

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants

Change in the constitution of Appellate Authority for CAs CSs and Cost Accountants In 2015, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs…

2 days ago
  • VAT

Trade Tax refund withheld beyond stipulated period & adjusted from demand unjustified – SC

Trade Tax Department was unjustified in retaining refund beyond stipulated period and adjusting it against default notices issued subsequently. In…

2 days ago
  • Income Tax

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income assessee is invalid

Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions…

3 days ago