Income Tax

Non-acceptance of IDS-2016 challan ITNS-286 by banks stating that Scheme has closed. CBDT lodges grievance with RBI

Non-acceptance of IDS-2016 challan ITNS-286 by banks stating that Scheme has closed on 30.09.2016. CBDT lodges grievance of declarants with RBI.

F. No.142/8/2016- TPL (Part)
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
(TPL Division)
***

New Delhi, dated 10th November, 2016

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Sub:  Grievance  regarding  non-allowance  by  banks  to  make  payment under IDS, 2016 through ITNS-286

A representation has been received from a declarant under IDS, 2016 stating that the State Bank of India at Bengaluru has refused to accept payments through income-tax challan ITNS-286. It has been alleged that the bank authorities refused to accept payment stating that since IDS, 2016 has closed on 30.09.2016 the banks cannot accept the said challan beyond the said date.

2. In this context, your kind attention is invited to notification S.O. 2476(E) dated 20.07.2016 wherein the following time schedule has been prescribed for making payments under IDS, 2016:

(i) a minimum amount of 25% of the tax, surcharge and penalty to be paid by 30.11.2016;
(ii) a further amount of 25% of the tax, surcharge and penalty to be paid by 3.2017; and
(iii) the balance amount to be paid on or before 30.9.2017

3. In view of the above, I am directed to r quest you to kindly bring the above time schedule for making payments under IDS, 2016 to the notice of all the banks and issue directions to the banks to accept payments under IDS, 2016 upto 30.09.2017.

(Dr. T. S. Mapwal)
Under Secretary (TPL-IV)

Shri N.S. Vishwanathan
Deputy Governor
Reserve Bank of India
New Delhi

Authors Note:
In response to the above, Indian Banks Association vide its letter has requested all Banks to make note of the time schedule for payments of taxes under IDS-2016 and as directed accept payments under IDS, 2016 upto 30.09.2017 and also for such cases the banks should not seek source of funds.

Share

Recent Posts

  • Income Tax

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without reference to DVO – ITAT

AO not justified in rejecting registered valuer’s report without making a reference to the DVO - ITAT In a recent…

4 days ago
  • FCRA

FCRA specifies list of 105 purposes to be selected for which registration is applied

FCRA specifies list of purposes to be selected for which registration is applied.  The Ministry of Home Affairs has notified…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Withholding tax u/s 40(a)(i) not required on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company

Assessee was not liable to withhold tax at source u/s 40(a)(i) on cost-to-cost reimbursement made to parent company In a…

1 week ago
  • Government

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App not disproportionate – Delhi High Court

Temporarily blocking public access to Telegram App under section 69A of IT Act 2000 is not disproportionate - Delhi HC…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA

High Court explains the meaning of term ‘enterprise’ appearing in section 80IA to means a project or an undertaking owned…

1 week ago
  • Income Tax

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash not owner who came up to own it

Addition deleted as assessee was only a carrier of cash and the real owner had come forward owning the cash…

2 weeks ago